Trusted by 1000+ brands
Brand VibeCheck Report
Netflix
netflix.comAI-Powered Sentiment Analysis
We analyzed real conversations across social media to understand how people really feel about Netflix.
Monitoring conversations on
13
😞
out of 100
Critical Issues
Based on real conversations from social media
Analyzed Oct 2, 2025
Sentiment Breakdown
How people feel about this brand
Positive
46%
Neutral
20%
Negative
33%
Brand Reputation Rankings
See how brands compare based on real sentiment analysis
What People Are Saying
Real conversations from across the web
ClaireRabbit13 days ago
Vibe Check
NO BAD WORD
NO BAD WORD BTW this same person used to like me but now hates me bc they listened to the shitty lies of some hater Also SO stands for Solar Opposites (me and my friend hate that show)
128
58
thiswitchslays2 days ago
Vibe Check
Here are the lines that were censored in Part II
Here are the lines that were censored in Part II For my loves watching season two on Netflix or through an adjacent streaming service, you have the copy originally intended for broadcast television. This means that unlike the “uncut” version that is exclusive to AMC+, yours includes the opening credits, blank spaces for ad breaks and a handful of changed lines that were reshot or voiced over to censor some of the swearing. While you’re not experiencing a major loss in content or anything, it’s still unfortunate, so I went and found *most* if not all of the line changes between the two versions of s2. I. *What Can the Damned Really Say to the Damned.* Lestat’s “I’m going to bloody kill you” should be “I’m going to fucking kill you.” II. Same episode. Claudia says “I forgave you for fucking up my plan” instead of the alternate “screwing up.” III. *Do You Know What It Means to Be Loved by Death.* While not from censorship, two lines have been cut for continuity around an ad break. When Daniel is mocking Louis with the telenovela theme, it’s supposed to go on playing over the following Paris flashback, causing Louis to get distracted and interrupt his story: “Can you turn off that music please?” to which Daniel goes, “yeah, sure.” But with the placement of an ad break in the middle it no longer works. IV. *No Pain.* Louis tells Armand, “I’m fucking tired of holding on to it.” They just omit the adverb. And then there’s Lestat referring to Armand as “mm, still a cunt?” instead of being forced to use a euphemism for it, “mm, still a bookbinder’s wife?” This one’s tragic. V. Same episode. Daniel gets a DM from Raglan James and says “fuck off.” VI. *I Could Not Prevent It,* Daniel wants Armand to confirm he “fucked over Louis, Claudia, and Madeleine” instead of the less cool “screwed over.” It’s so much spicier. Left out a few trivial instances, like a quick use of “fucking” from Santiago being replaced by “bloody” in episode 6. I don’t think there’s much else… other than I’m feeling a little gaslit for being made to swear up and down to my mother that “Lestat really *does* call Armand a cunt” after last night’s watch served bookbinder instead of cunt.
74
6
Larushka2 days ago
Vibe Check
Proof of Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta against the Wales’
Proof of Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta against the Wales’ This detailed post on X by HRHLadyJ really puts into perspective their recent attacks on the Wales. And their pro-Sussex stance. You have to wonder how much of this is fueled by the new Sussex PR team. ————— The Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta: A Month of Smears on William and Catherine In the sweltering heat of August and September 2025, the @DailyMail unleashed a torrent of vitriol against Prince William, Catherine, the Princess of Wales, and even King Charles III. What began as whispers about a family home move quickly snowballed into a full-scale assault: accusations of “control freak” tendencies, “underwhelming” duties, a “dark past” tied to slavery, and hints of irreparable rifts. Collages of headlines tell the story — dozens of pieces from the Mail’s royal “hit squad,” peddling speculation as fact, while royal watchers cried “propaganda!” after every drop. This wasn’t journalism. It was SEO warfare dressed up as reporting, cynically timed to ride search trends like “William lazy,” “Kate health,” and “Charles succession,” while dangling glowing comparisons to bait Sussex fans. The Mail’s royal desk has turned itself into a digital sweatshop where outrage is the currency. Every article is deliberately contradictory — William is “too private” one day, “too performative” the next; Catherine is “influential but holding him back”; Charles is “weak but meddling.” Why? Because conflict sells. Rage-clicks fill MailOnline’s coffers. It’s the business model of chaos — and chaos is the coin of their grubby little realm. Now, in a twist worthy of their own soap-opera scripts, two of the Mail’s most prolific royal scribblers— Rebecca English and Richard Eden —have pivoted to pearl-clutching exposés about a “sinister plot” and “calculated wedge” undermining William and Catherine. It’s laughable. These aren’t brave whistleblowers; they’re architects of the very narrative they’re now decrying. The Daily Mail didn’t just report the hate—they manufactured it, weaponised it, monetised it, and now want to wash their hands as if they were bystanders. It’s the Fleet Street equivalent of throwing petrol on a bonfire, then sobbing that one’s eyebrows got singed. The Mail’s hypocrisy is breathtaking. For weeks, they ran columns dripping with Sussex apologia — Griffiths acting as Harry’s stenographer and Platell recycling Meghan’s grievances as “concerns,” and A.N. Wilson psychoanalysing William from his study like some amateur Freud-for-hire. All this while YouTube commenters and even their own readers blasted their Royals channel as “toxic propaganda.” But rather than adjust course, they doubled down — until subscribers fled and advertisers grew squeamish. Only then did the pivot to victimhood begin. One could almost hear the gnashing of teeth in Kensington High Street. Let’s expose the rot at the heart of this tabloid machine — how they orchestrated the smears, gamed the algorithms, amplified Sussex narratives, twisted facts into weapons, and how their financial decline drives the cruelty. The curtain must be pulled back, and the stagehands caught red-handed, script in one hand, calculator in the other. The Hit Parade: A Catalogue of Calculated Cruelty From 1 August to 27 September 2025, the Daily Mail’s royal desk became a factory for anti-Wales ammunition, deploying a multi-pronged strategy: recycle old grudges into fresh headlines, cherry-pick data to misrepresent workloads, sensationalise historical trivia, and frame every decision as evidence of impending royal collapse. The trigger? William and Catherine’s pragmatic decision to relocate from Adelaide Cottage to Forest Lodge on the Sandringham estate — a “forever home” for family stability amid Catherine’s cancer recovery and global threats. What should have been a non-story morphed into “proof” of William’s fatal flaws: too private, too lazy, too “woke,” too everything. In short, too damned convenient for the Mail’s search engine tinkering. This was not random. The Mail runs on click-chains: one “exclusive” generates spinoffs, which are then linked in sidebars, ensuring readers never escape the outrage cycle. Eviction headlines lead into slavery history “revelations,” which link to workload hit pieces, which in turn promote YouTube debate clips. It is algorithmic entrapment sold as news — a kind of journalistic mousetrap baited with bile. Here’s the rogue’s gallery of the worst offenders, their pieces dripping with pro-Sussex favoritism and wild conjecture, broken down by tactic: • Amanda Platell (Columnist): On 20 August, Platell sneered at William’s “puny” 71 engagements, cherry-picking incomplete 2024 figures and ignoring health crises in the family. She compared him unfavourably to Princess Anne and accused him of making the Firm “pure vanilla.” Platell’s column was SEO-stuffed with phrases like “workshy heir” and “royal crisis” — all designed to trend on Google and bait shares. Her follow-ups even recycled Meghan’s old “baby brain” anecdote as if it were fresh ammunition. This isn’t journalism; it’s content farming — and farming in barren soil at that. • Christopher Wilson (Historian/Columnist): On 23 August, Wilson exhumed Forest Lodge’s “dark past,” weaponising obscure history to frame William and Catherine as morally negligent. The piece was algorithmically tied to MailOnline’s “slavery legacy” tag — the same tag used to cover Netflix’s colonial dramas. It wasn’t about informing readers; it was about capturing traffic off unrelated cultural debates. Like a ghoul rifling through parish records for sport. • A.N. Wilson (Royal Author): On 19 September, he declared William “angry and unhappy,” citing outdated stats and palace whispers. But more insidious was the Mail’s packaging: push alerts framed it as a “shock diagnosis,” with sidebars linking to Sussex puff pieces. William’s Earthshot success was buried, Harry’s “fun scamp” antics headlined. Manipulation by design, as brazen as a conjurer’s sleight of hand. • Charlotte Griffiths (Royal Correspondent): On 13 September, Griffiths painted William as the villain blocking Harry’s reconciliation. Her reliance on “anonymous sources” was classic Mail — unverifiable quotes crafted to fuel fan wars online. Each story was cross-promoted under MailOnline’s “Sussex comeback” hub, ensuring clicks from both sides of the aisle. Division is profitable, and she is its clerk of works. • Liz Jones (Columnist): On 5 September, Jones targeted Kate’s “bronde” hair during a visit to the Natural History Museum gardens, mixing sharp critique with grudging praise. Trolls called the lighter shade “washed out” or a “wig,” but Jones framed it as smart and empowering, signalling Kate’s post-cancer confidence. Her long history of nitpicking Kate’s hair — from 2012 bangs to post-2024 hospital styles — fits the pattern: personal opinion masquerading as insight, always driving clicks. She also recently editorialised against William as a future king, questioning his temperament and charisma, further stoking debate and subtly undermining the heir apparent. • Tina Brown (via Mail amplification): Brown’s Vanity Fair critiques were sliced into fragments and drip-fed as “Mail exclusives.” This is another trick: repackaging syndicated content as fresh scoops, maximising monetisation while disguising the recycling. In Fleet Street terms, it’s reheated cabbage passed off as coq au vin. • Rebecca English & Richard Eden: Even before their pivot, both poured fuel on the fire. English questioned the Forest Lodge move as a “taxpayer gamble” (24 September). Eden mocked it as indecisiveness (18 September). Both columns carried DailyMailPlus paywall teasers, designed to convert outrage into subscriptions. This wasn’t reporting. It was a coordinated content strategy: anonymous sourcing (cheap and unverifiable), data manipulation (engagement cherry-picking), and emotional framing (slavery, evictions, family rifts) — all calculated to maximise page dwell-time and comments. It’s the cynical mechanics of Fleet Street turned up to eleven, all brass band and no tune. The Asinine Pivot: From Smear-Mongers to Victimhood By late September, the Mail faced a problem: the narrative it had stoked was now boomeranging. Readers began calling out bias, subscribers fled, and Palace Confidential was haemorrhaging viewers. Cue the pivot. • On 25 September, Eden wailed about a “sinister plot.” • On 26 September, English warned of a “wedge between Charles and William.” Both pieces were smoke and mirrors. They rehashed earlier reporting — their own reporting — while pretending to be alarmed that anti-Wales narratives were spreading. Classic Mail: start the fire, then play the firefighter. They build the echo chamber, harvest the clicks, and when the backlash hits, shrug and blame “external forces.” It is not just hypocrisy — it is fraud. Fraud against readers, against journalism, against public trust. A betrayal wrapped in bunting. YouTube Implosion: Palace Confidential’s Monarchy Meltdown The nadir came mid-September when the Mail’s Palace Confidential channel speculated if William’s reign would “end the monarchy.” The video was a montage of the very print smears their own desk had churned out — workload cherry-picking, rift whispers, Forest Lodge doom-mongering. Within days, subscribers plummeted by the thousands. Comment sections filled with accusations of “hateful propaganda.” Forensic look at the analytics shows watch-time collapsing, click-through rates nosediving. Why? Because even Mail loyalists saw through the con. They were watching for the same reheated slop, dressed up as “exclusive debate.” According to VidIQ data, the Daily Mail Royals YouTube channel currently shows around 482,000 subscribers and has amassed over 313 million total video views. While those are nontrivial numbers, the channel’s estimated monthly earnings do not vindicate the hours of content churn — often in the modest range of £14,580–44,550 depending on viewership and ad engagement. In other words, the editorial excess is not being rewarded by proportionate audience loyalty or monetisation growth — the metrics are flat or weakening under scrutiny. Tubics data earlier in 2025 had placed the Daily Mail Royals subscriber count at ~464,000 with a view count ~292 million, indicating very slow growth — a channel in stagnation rather than ascendancy. This wasn’t content collapse; it was audience striking back. The vox populi spoke — and it said, enough. Follow the Money: The Mail’s Financial Desperation To understand why the Daily Mail behaves this way, you must follow the money. The pathology of smear campaigns is fed by urgent financial pressure. • Print decline: As of June 2025, the Daily Mail’s audited daily circulation stood at ~631,191 copies. That figure reflects a dramatic shrinkage over years — the paper, once selling well into multiple hundreds of thousands more, is now hollowed out. • Yearly comparisons: In 2024, ABC audit figures showed the Daily Mail had a daily circulation of 706,839 — meaning circulation has dropped by over 10% in roughly a year. • Advertiser exodus: In January 2025, the Mail announced it would merge its print and online teams and initiate cost-cutting, as major advertisers increasingly balk at brand adjacency with toxic, polarising content. The memo revealed that Mail+ (the paywall arm) had achieved 100,000 paying subscribers since its launch — a modest number given the scale of MailOnline’s reach. • Staff cuts as symptom: This internal restructuring is not optional — it is a forced retreat. Under the integration plan, job losses are anticipated. • Parent group pressure: DMG Media, the Mail’s owner, has made it clear that the print-online integration is about survival in a hostile advertising environment and declining print returns. In short, the Mail is bleeding. These royal smear campaigns aren’t just editorial cynicism — they’re a press outlet in full panic, scrabbling for clicks, subscriptions, and relevance by flogging scandal, outrage, and division. It’s the frantic thrashing of a swimmer who knows the tide has turned against them. Dirty Hands, No Excuses: Time to Hold the Mail Accountable The Daily Mail’s hands aren’t just dirty — they’re smeared, ink-stained with the fingerprints of manipulation. This wasn’t an accident, not a slip of the editorial pen. It was deliberate. They gamed algorithms like card sharks stacking a deck, pitted fandoms against one another like gladiators in the Coliseum, and weaponised history, health, and grief as if they were trinkets to be traded for clicks. @charlotteEaLMoS , @amandajplatell, A.N. Wilson, @TinaBrownLM, @LizJonesGoddess and the rest dutifully acted as stenographers for Sussex spin; @RE_DailyMail and @richardaeden cried about “plots” they themselves had stoked; and editors signed off on every exaggeration, knowing that rage pays the bills. And now, when the wind shifts, they dare pivot to victimhood — as if they were the collateral and not the culprits. It’s theatre. Bad theatre. And the damage? It’s carved into public trust like graffiti on a listed building. The contrast couldn’t be clearer. William and Catherine ride out the storm with quiet resilience, their 74% approval proving that duty and dignity still matter. The monarchy carries on; the Mail only carries on as long as division sells. Readers aren’t fooled. Legacy media is collapsing under the weight of its own duplicity. Advertisers abandoned The Sun after Hillsborough. News of the World collapsed after phone hacking. And the Daily Mail — drunk on its own poison — is staggering toward the same graveyard. This was never “just gossip.” It was calculated sabotage dressed up in broadsheet clothing, a smear campaign masquerading as reportage, a racket that hollowed out the very idea of journalism. They didn’t just observe events; they made them happen. They didn’t reflect public opinion; they twisted it. They didn’t hold power to account; they abused it. The case is closed. The Waleses endure — proof that quiet service and real substance always outlast scandal. The Mail’s hit squad, by contrast, are done. History won’t remember them as kingmakers, only as mercenaries who confused clickbait for craft and outrage for insight, and in the process wrote their own obituaries. They won’t go down as journalists; they’ll go down as clickbait casualties — yesterday’s men and women, swept away by the very tide they tried to ride. #BoycottDailyMail #WeAreTheMediaNow #RoyalSmearCampaign #ExposeTheMail #MediaManipulation #StopTheSpin #TabloidTyranny #FakeNewsFactory #MonarchyVsMedia #FleetStreetFraud #TruthOverClickbait #InkStainedLies
43
16
Important_Task_81793 days ago
Vibe Check
This has been reported, right?
This has been reported, right? Apologies if this is duplication. https://deadline.com/2025/10/the-ultimatum-queer-love-canceled-netflix-1236568742/
26
13
Sea_Atmosphere51053 days ago
Vibe Check
Season 3
Season 3 🖤✨ It’s official! Wednesday is coming back for Season 3 — and this time, the story is about to get even darker. Netflix has confirmed that the chilling new chapter will dive deeper into the Hyde mythology… with shocking twists, sinister secrets, and terrifying truths set to unravel at Nevermore Academy. 😱🔥 But how will Wednesday face the darkness that’s been haunting her since Season 2? And what hidden connections could change everything we thought we knew? 👀 Fans are already bracing for the most intense season yet…Details below 👇👇
18
6
Expert_Book_99833 days ago
Vibe Check
Troubled Teen Industry?
Troubled Teen Industry? I’m not sure if I’m remembering wrong (or maybe I just imagined it or saw it from another podcast) but has YWA done a dedicated episode on the “Troubled Teen Industry”? I just watched Mae Martin’s new Netflix miniseries ‘Wayward’ and it covers a lot of themes that I feel like You’re Wrong About has also discussed, mainly: - Recovered memory therapy and other discredited forms of therapy. - Moral panics about teens.
16
11
latefair3 days ago
Vibe Check
Hilarious Family S1 兰闺喜事 - cosy laughs
Hilarious Family S1 兰闺喜事 - cosy laughs [L-R: 4th sis Keling \(Li Jiaqi\), 3rd sis Banxia \(Wu Jiayi\), Du Ruyu \(Liu Lin\), 2nd sis Peilan \(Jackie Li\), 1st sis Jinrong \(Han Yun Yun\)](https://preview.redd.it/eh6whondqpsf1.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=4f7a36b39b1c65ebb30cf776ecbec5954c89cf31) Hilarious Family S1 (兰闺喜事 Lan Gui Xi Shi - [MDL link](https://mydramalist.com/715647-lai-gui-xi-shi)) tells the story of a mother and her four daughters as they navigate growing up and getting married. It does have some similarities to the setup of Netflix's Perfect Match (2025) - comedy where mildly impoverished widow moves to a bigger town to get her daughters married off - but they are quite different beasts. Liu Lin plays the harassed and put-upon Du Ruyu, whose patience is greatly tried by the quirks and oddities of her daughters - >!her eldest, aged 29 years and 16 months, is picky and materialistic and wants to marry rich; her second, a homebody who *doesn't* want to marry out; her third, an inflexible bookworm; and her fourth, an immature wannabe heroine (i.e. troublemaker).!< I'm only four episodes in so far, but I am absolutely loving it. The plot is full of hijinks, but the mood is mellow and mild. There's a fair bit of squabbling to drive the interpersonal conflicts, but it feels just like being in a room full of your favourite people - sometimes you get on each other's nerves, but at the end of the day it's all patched up with love. [This show is making me a big fan of Han Yun Yun \(R\) - she handles Jinrong so deftly that the character never tips over from annoying to aggravating, and she has had excellent comic chemistry with pretty much everyone else so far](https://preview.redd.it/4idorfabypsf1.png?width=660&format=png&auto=webp&s=e43d2c37cbc7b26787a1d2fa6b7afc45ee060ecc) I mean, they named the main male lead 路不平 (Lu Bu Ping), which translates literally to Uneven (rough) Road. And look at his character introduction! This gentle trolling is exactly how I might describe my siblings. It reminds me of a post I saw recently - [what is your sibling's contact name on your phone](https://www.reddit.com/r/CasualConversation/comments/1nt0rjq/what_is_your_siblings_contact_name_on_your_phone/) \- read some of the funnier anecdotes and tell me that isn't the same kind of humour! [Translation: he's a bit of a loser and he's gonna get in his own way more often than not](https://preview.redd.it/7tdof7ewzpsf1.png?width=1108&format=png&auto=webp&s=094b994a040370619f4d98b38c24106fb00f58f6) The opening song 《我想干啥就干啥》is a perfect match (hah) to this easygoing spirit. There's two versions listed in the OST, but my favourite is the one sung by 锤娜丽莎 Chui Na Li Sha, who also appears as a reoccurring minor character. I usually skip openings but I'd gladly sit through this one just to hear it every time. 我想笑了我就笑\~ This is a perfect show to unwind with when you're on the hellish commute to/from work, and I would be doing just that *if my phone hadn't manifested the green lines of death* (curse you, Samsung! \*shakes fist\*). It hasn't made me belly laugh yet, but each episode has left me with a warm heart and a wide grin, and I am absolutely looking forward to seeing how it will end.
16
7
Sunflowerwrites_3 days ago
Vibe Check
Mantis (movie) was a good watch.
Mantis (movie) was a good watch. There can be few aspects that I can give ratings, like casting was 10/10. The story frustrates me a little bit, but it is a decent watch, maybe because it is a spin-off movie, and I did not know that, so maybe I can feel a bit disconnected, but honestly, not that disconnected. So, story-wise, 6/10. The action scenes were really well choreographed, which would be 7/10. The pacing is good, I would say, and the acting is also 10/10. Especially from **Park Gyu Young**. I really, really like this actress, like, she steals the show for me every time. In Squid Games, in Sweet Home, in Nine Puzzles. I just love her. The other actors were really great too. It is just, Park Gyu Young really sticks out to me. The complaint from this story can be what they are trying to tell, cause there are lots of aspects in this. The main leads have a complicated relationship, and do they really overcome that? Cause I feel like they did, but couldn't quite understand. But the journey of how it became complicated, I really liked that. It is about superiority, power, and pride. It is just wanting to prove worth from the female lead's side, and to protect what you love from the male lead's side. Cause there is literally a dialogue where they go "protect what you love", but that love felt complicated, even sad at some points. So, from several perspectives, this could be a solid movie, just need to present it well. So, overall, 7/10 I would like to give this movie.
15
4
CombPsychological5073 days ago
Vibe Check
This show just reminded me how much I hate streaming services.
This show just reminded me how much I hate streaming services. Just finished my yearly Sopranos watch through, so naturally, its time to start Nurse Jackie again. Signed up for Paramount+ again, expecting it to be there in its Showtime section. Even google says its there! And of course, they hide the library behind a sign up splash screen, so you can't even actually check until you sign up. Shocker, its gone. I get blah blah streaming rights, but Jesus, if you're showtime and you own the show, at least reserve the damn right to always stream it yourself, even if it's going to Netflix for awhile. And what's up with the wait?? It's not like they have to drive the damn DVD's over from Paramount to Netflix, anticipation for a 10 year old show to come to Netflix?
15
13
Skyeis_uhh_overthere2 days ago
Vibe Check
I think I had an acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was so scary.
I think I had an acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was so scary. I think I had my third ever acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was really scary. Luckily it was much milder than the one that sent me to the ER, but still. It started the same as the other ones- as a regular migraine with aura, but after about an hour, I realized I couldn’t read the Reddit posts I was looking at anymore. I would try to read a sentence and each word was so hard to work out- I’d read the word with a lot manual effort but the meaning then wouldn’t make much sense, then I’d try to read the next word but when I tried to read it, a completely different random word would come out instead and that kept happening over and over. Everything became gibberish and it was impossible to comprehend written words. I was then trying to tell my partner what was happening and speaking out loud was similar, too. I was trying to communicate but the words I said didn’t make sense to me and random words kept popping up constantly which made everything so confusing and hard to keep track of. If I remember right, I managed to get out quite a few statements that made sense eventually, but not without having to reattempt the statements sometimes five times in a row. I would string a few words together, then the incessant random words would make me hit a wall or the words i was saying would just stop making any sense to me, so then I’d start back at the beginning and try again, and then again. I tried honing in on Kath and Kim which was playing on Netflix but everything was gibberish once again. Even when I wasn’t trying to speak, random words and strings of syllables were entering my mind and they all baffled me- what did any of it mean? I had no idea. It was so scary. After less than an hour, I gradually started to be able to make sense of things again. Words started making sense and the random words and syllables from inside my mind slowed down and then stopped. My migraine lasted many more hours but the confusional part was luckily short lived. But regardless, what the actual hell was any of that. It was so confusing and frightening. Has anyone else dealt with this or know someone who has?
11
0
ClaireRabbit13 days ago
Vibe Check
NO BAD WORD
NO BAD WORD BTW this same person used to like me but now hates me bc they listened to the shitty lies of some hater Also SO stands for Solar Opposites (me and my friend hate that show)
128
58
thiswitchslays2 days ago
Vibe Check
Here are the lines that were censored in Part II
Here are the lines that were censored in Part II For my loves watching season two on Netflix or through an adjacent streaming service, you have the copy originally intended for broadcast television. This means that unlike the “uncut” version that is exclusive to AMC+, yours includes the opening credits, blank spaces for ad breaks and a handful of changed lines that were reshot or voiced over to censor some of the swearing. While you’re not experiencing a major loss in content or anything, it’s still unfortunate, so I went and found *most* if not all of the line changes between the two versions of s2. I. *What Can the Damned Really Say to the Damned.* Lestat’s “I’m going to bloody kill you” should be “I’m going to fucking kill you.” II. Same episode. Claudia says “I forgave you for fucking up my plan” instead of the alternate “screwing up.” III. *Do You Know What It Means to Be Loved by Death.* While not from censorship, two lines have been cut for continuity around an ad break. When Daniel is mocking Louis with the telenovela theme, it’s supposed to go on playing over the following Paris flashback, causing Louis to get distracted and interrupt his story: “Can you turn off that music please?” to which Daniel goes, “yeah, sure.” But with the placement of an ad break in the middle it no longer works. IV. *No Pain.* Louis tells Armand, “I’m fucking tired of holding on to it.” They just omit the adverb. And then there’s Lestat referring to Armand as “mm, still a cunt?” instead of being forced to use a euphemism for it, “mm, still a bookbinder’s wife?” This one’s tragic. V. Same episode. Daniel gets a DM from Raglan James and says “fuck off.” VI. *I Could Not Prevent It,* Daniel wants Armand to confirm he “fucked over Louis, Claudia, and Madeleine” instead of the less cool “screwed over.” It’s so much spicier. Left out a few trivial instances, like a quick use of “fucking” from Santiago being replaced by “bloody” in episode 6. I don’t think there’s much else… other than I’m feeling a little gaslit for being made to swear up and down to my mother that “Lestat really *does* call Armand a cunt” after last night’s watch served bookbinder instead of cunt.
74
6
Larushka2 days ago
Vibe Check
Proof of Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta against the Wales’
Proof of Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta against the Wales’ This detailed post on X by HRHLadyJ really puts into perspective their recent attacks on the Wales. And their pro-Sussex stance. You have to wonder how much of this is fueled by the new Sussex PR team. ————— The Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta: A Month of Smears on William and Catherine In the sweltering heat of August and September 2025, the @DailyMail unleashed a torrent of vitriol against Prince William, Catherine, the Princess of Wales, and even King Charles III. What began as whispers about a family home move quickly snowballed into a full-scale assault: accusations of “control freak” tendencies, “underwhelming” duties, a “dark past” tied to slavery, and hints of irreparable rifts. Collages of headlines tell the story — dozens of pieces from the Mail’s royal “hit squad,” peddling speculation as fact, while royal watchers cried “propaganda!” after every drop. This wasn’t journalism. It was SEO warfare dressed up as reporting, cynically timed to ride search trends like “William lazy,” “Kate health,” and “Charles succession,” while dangling glowing comparisons to bait Sussex fans. The Mail’s royal desk has turned itself into a digital sweatshop where outrage is the currency. Every article is deliberately contradictory — William is “too private” one day, “too performative” the next; Catherine is “influential but holding him back”; Charles is “weak but meddling.” Why? Because conflict sells. Rage-clicks fill MailOnline’s coffers. It’s the business model of chaos — and chaos is the coin of their grubby little realm. Now, in a twist worthy of their own soap-opera scripts, two of the Mail’s most prolific royal scribblers— Rebecca English and Richard Eden —have pivoted to pearl-clutching exposés about a “sinister plot” and “calculated wedge” undermining William and Catherine. It’s laughable. These aren’t brave whistleblowers; they’re architects of the very narrative they’re now decrying. The Daily Mail didn’t just report the hate—they manufactured it, weaponised it, monetised it, and now want to wash their hands as if they were bystanders. It’s the Fleet Street equivalent of throwing petrol on a bonfire, then sobbing that one’s eyebrows got singed. The Mail’s hypocrisy is breathtaking. For weeks, they ran columns dripping with Sussex apologia — Griffiths acting as Harry’s stenographer and Platell recycling Meghan’s grievances as “concerns,” and A.N. Wilson psychoanalysing William from his study like some amateur Freud-for-hire. All this while YouTube commenters and even their own readers blasted their Royals channel as “toxic propaganda.” But rather than adjust course, they doubled down — until subscribers fled and advertisers grew squeamish. Only then did the pivot to victimhood begin. One could almost hear the gnashing of teeth in Kensington High Street. Let’s expose the rot at the heart of this tabloid machine — how they orchestrated the smears, gamed the algorithms, amplified Sussex narratives, twisted facts into weapons, and how their financial decline drives the cruelty. The curtain must be pulled back, and the stagehands caught red-handed, script in one hand, calculator in the other. The Hit Parade: A Catalogue of Calculated Cruelty From 1 August to 27 September 2025, the Daily Mail’s royal desk became a factory for anti-Wales ammunition, deploying a multi-pronged strategy: recycle old grudges into fresh headlines, cherry-pick data to misrepresent workloads, sensationalise historical trivia, and frame every decision as evidence of impending royal collapse. The trigger? William and Catherine’s pragmatic decision to relocate from Adelaide Cottage to Forest Lodge on the Sandringham estate — a “forever home” for family stability amid Catherine’s cancer recovery and global threats. What should have been a non-story morphed into “proof” of William’s fatal flaws: too private, too lazy, too “woke,” too everything. In short, too damned convenient for the Mail’s search engine tinkering. This was not random. The Mail runs on click-chains: one “exclusive” generates spinoffs, which are then linked in sidebars, ensuring readers never escape the outrage cycle. Eviction headlines lead into slavery history “revelations,” which link to workload hit pieces, which in turn promote YouTube debate clips. It is algorithmic entrapment sold as news — a kind of journalistic mousetrap baited with bile. Here’s the rogue’s gallery of the worst offenders, their pieces dripping with pro-Sussex favoritism and wild conjecture, broken down by tactic: • Amanda Platell (Columnist): On 20 August, Platell sneered at William’s “puny” 71 engagements, cherry-picking incomplete 2024 figures and ignoring health crises in the family. She compared him unfavourably to Princess Anne and accused him of making the Firm “pure vanilla.” Platell’s column was SEO-stuffed with phrases like “workshy heir” and “royal crisis” — all designed to trend on Google and bait shares. Her follow-ups even recycled Meghan’s old “baby brain” anecdote as if it were fresh ammunition. This isn’t journalism; it’s content farming — and farming in barren soil at that. • Christopher Wilson (Historian/Columnist): On 23 August, Wilson exhumed Forest Lodge’s “dark past,” weaponising obscure history to frame William and Catherine as morally negligent. The piece was algorithmically tied to MailOnline’s “slavery legacy” tag — the same tag used to cover Netflix’s colonial dramas. It wasn’t about informing readers; it was about capturing traffic off unrelated cultural debates. Like a ghoul rifling through parish records for sport. • A.N. Wilson (Royal Author): On 19 September, he declared William “angry and unhappy,” citing outdated stats and palace whispers. But more insidious was the Mail’s packaging: push alerts framed it as a “shock diagnosis,” with sidebars linking to Sussex puff pieces. William’s Earthshot success was buried, Harry’s “fun scamp” antics headlined. Manipulation by design, as brazen as a conjurer’s sleight of hand. • Charlotte Griffiths (Royal Correspondent): On 13 September, Griffiths painted William as the villain blocking Harry’s reconciliation. Her reliance on “anonymous sources” was classic Mail — unverifiable quotes crafted to fuel fan wars online. Each story was cross-promoted under MailOnline’s “Sussex comeback” hub, ensuring clicks from both sides of the aisle. Division is profitable, and she is its clerk of works. • Liz Jones (Columnist): On 5 September, Jones targeted Kate’s “bronde” hair during a visit to the Natural History Museum gardens, mixing sharp critique with grudging praise. Trolls called the lighter shade “washed out” or a “wig,” but Jones framed it as smart and empowering, signalling Kate’s post-cancer confidence. Her long history of nitpicking Kate’s hair — from 2012 bangs to post-2024 hospital styles — fits the pattern: personal opinion masquerading as insight, always driving clicks. She also recently editorialised against William as a future king, questioning his temperament and charisma, further stoking debate and subtly undermining the heir apparent. • Tina Brown (via Mail amplification): Brown’s Vanity Fair critiques were sliced into fragments and drip-fed as “Mail exclusives.” This is another trick: repackaging syndicated content as fresh scoops, maximising monetisation while disguising the recycling. In Fleet Street terms, it’s reheated cabbage passed off as coq au vin. • Rebecca English & Richard Eden: Even before their pivot, both poured fuel on the fire. English questioned the Forest Lodge move as a “taxpayer gamble” (24 September). Eden mocked it as indecisiveness (18 September). Both columns carried DailyMailPlus paywall teasers, designed to convert outrage into subscriptions. This wasn’t reporting. It was a coordinated content strategy: anonymous sourcing (cheap and unverifiable), data manipulation (engagement cherry-picking), and emotional framing (slavery, evictions, family rifts) — all calculated to maximise page dwell-time and comments. It’s the cynical mechanics of Fleet Street turned up to eleven, all brass band and no tune. The Asinine Pivot: From Smear-Mongers to Victimhood By late September, the Mail faced a problem: the narrative it had stoked was now boomeranging. Readers began calling out bias, subscribers fled, and Palace Confidential was haemorrhaging viewers. Cue the pivot. • On 25 September, Eden wailed about a “sinister plot.” • On 26 September, English warned of a “wedge between Charles and William.” Both pieces were smoke and mirrors. They rehashed earlier reporting — their own reporting — while pretending to be alarmed that anti-Wales narratives were spreading. Classic Mail: start the fire, then play the firefighter. They build the echo chamber, harvest the clicks, and when the backlash hits, shrug and blame “external forces.” It is not just hypocrisy — it is fraud. Fraud against readers, against journalism, against public trust. A betrayal wrapped in bunting. YouTube Implosion: Palace Confidential’s Monarchy Meltdown The nadir came mid-September when the Mail’s Palace Confidential channel speculated if William’s reign would “end the monarchy.” The video was a montage of the very print smears their own desk had churned out — workload cherry-picking, rift whispers, Forest Lodge doom-mongering. Within days, subscribers plummeted by the thousands. Comment sections filled with accusations of “hateful propaganda.” Forensic look at the analytics shows watch-time collapsing, click-through rates nosediving. Why? Because even Mail loyalists saw through the con. They were watching for the same reheated slop, dressed up as “exclusive debate.” According to VidIQ data, the Daily Mail Royals YouTube channel currently shows around 482,000 subscribers and has amassed over 313 million total video views. While those are nontrivial numbers, the channel’s estimated monthly earnings do not vindicate the hours of content churn — often in the modest range of £14,580–44,550 depending on viewership and ad engagement. In other words, the editorial excess is not being rewarded by proportionate audience loyalty or monetisation growth — the metrics are flat or weakening under scrutiny. Tubics data earlier in 2025 had placed the Daily Mail Royals subscriber count at ~464,000 with a view count ~292 million, indicating very slow growth — a channel in stagnation rather than ascendancy. This wasn’t content collapse; it was audience striking back. The vox populi spoke — and it said, enough. Follow the Money: The Mail’s Financial Desperation To understand why the Daily Mail behaves this way, you must follow the money. The pathology of smear campaigns is fed by urgent financial pressure. • Print decline: As of June 2025, the Daily Mail’s audited daily circulation stood at ~631,191 copies. That figure reflects a dramatic shrinkage over years — the paper, once selling well into multiple hundreds of thousands more, is now hollowed out. • Yearly comparisons: In 2024, ABC audit figures showed the Daily Mail had a daily circulation of 706,839 — meaning circulation has dropped by over 10% in roughly a year. • Advertiser exodus: In January 2025, the Mail announced it would merge its print and online teams and initiate cost-cutting, as major advertisers increasingly balk at brand adjacency with toxic, polarising content. The memo revealed that Mail+ (the paywall arm) had achieved 100,000 paying subscribers since its launch — a modest number given the scale of MailOnline’s reach. • Staff cuts as symptom: This internal restructuring is not optional — it is a forced retreat. Under the integration plan, job losses are anticipated. • Parent group pressure: DMG Media, the Mail’s owner, has made it clear that the print-online integration is about survival in a hostile advertising environment and declining print returns. In short, the Mail is bleeding. These royal smear campaigns aren’t just editorial cynicism — they’re a press outlet in full panic, scrabbling for clicks, subscriptions, and relevance by flogging scandal, outrage, and division. It’s the frantic thrashing of a swimmer who knows the tide has turned against them. Dirty Hands, No Excuses: Time to Hold the Mail Accountable The Daily Mail’s hands aren’t just dirty — they’re smeared, ink-stained with the fingerprints of manipulation. This wasn’t an accident, not a slip of the editorial pen. It was deliberate. They gamed algorithms like card sharks stacking a deck, pitted fandoms against one another like gladiators in the Coliseum, and weaponised history, health, and grief as if they were trinkets to be traded for clicks. @charlotteEaLMoS , @amandajplatell, A.N. Wilson, @TinaBrownLM, @LizJonesGoddess and the rest dutifully acted as stenographers for Sussex spin; @RE_DailyMail and @richardaeden cried about “plots” they themselves had stoked; and editors signed off on every exaggeration, knowing that rage pays the bills. And now, when the wind shifts, they dare pivot to victimhood — as if they were the collateral and not the culprits. It’s theatre. Bad theatre. And the damage? It’s carved into public trust like graffiti on a listed building. The contrast couldn’t be clearer. William and Catherine ride out the storm with quiet resilience, their 74% approval proving that duty and dignity still matter. The monarchy carries on; the Mail only carries on as long as division sells. Readers aren’t fooled. Legacy media is collapsing under the weight of its own duplicity. Advertisers abandoned The Sun after Hillsborough. News of the World collapsed after phone hacking. And the Daily Mail — drunk on its own poison — is staggering toward the same graveyard. This was never “just gossip.” It was calculated sabotage dressed up in broadsheet clothing, a smear campaign masquerading as reportage, a racket that hollowed out the very idea of journalism. They didn’t just observe events; they made them happen. They didn’t reflect public opinion; they twisted it. They didn’t hold power to account; they abused it. The case is closed. The Waleses endure — proof that quiet service and real substance always outlast scandal. The Mail’s hit squad, by contrast, are done. History won’t remember them as kingmakers, only as mercenaries who confused clickbait for craft and outrage for insight, and in the process wrote their own obituaries. They won’t go down as journalists; they’ll go down as clickbait casualties — yesterday’s men and women, swept away by the very tide they tried to ride. #BoycottDailyMail #WeAreTheMediaNow #RoyalSmearCampaign #ExposeTheMail #MediaManipulation #StopTheSpin #TabloidTyranny #FakeNewsFactory #MonarchyVsMedia #FleetStreetFraud #TruthOverClickbait #InkStainedLies
43
16
Important_Task_81793 days ago
Vibe Check
This has been reported, right?
This has been reported, right? Apologies if this is duplication. https://deadline.com/2025/10/the-ultimatum-queer-love-canceled-netflix-1236568742/
26
13
Sea_Atmosphere51053 days ago
Vibe Check
Season 3
Season 3 🖤✨ It’s official! Wednesday is coming back for Season 3 — and this time, the story is about to get even darker. Netflix has confirmed that the chilling new chapter will dive deeper into the Hyde mythology… with shocking twists, sinister secrets, and terrifying truths set to unravel at Nevermore Academy. 😱🔥 But how will Wednesday face the darkness that’s been haunting her since Season 2? And what hidden connections could change everything we thought we knew? 👀 Fans are already bracing for the most intense season yet…Details below 👇👇
18
6
Expert_Book_99833 days ago
Vibe Check
Troubled Teen Industry?
Troubled Teen Industry? I’m not sure if I’m remembering wrong (or maybe I just imagined it or saw it from another podcast) but has YWA done a dedicated episode on the “Troubled Teen Industry”? I just watched Mae Martin’s new Netflix miniseries ‘Wayward’ and it covers a lot of themes that I feel like You’re Wrong About has also discussed, mainly: - Recovered memory therapy and other discredited forms of therapy. - Moral panics about teens.
16
11
latefair3 days ago
Vibe Check
Hilarious Family S1 兰闺喜事 - cosy laughs
Hilarious Family S1 兰闺喜事 - cosy laughs [L-R: 4th sis Keling \(Li Jiaqi\), 3rd sis Banxia \(Wu Jiayi\), Du Ruyu \(Liu Lin\), 2nd sis Peilan \(Jackie Li\), 1st sis Jinrong \(Han Yun Yun\)](https://preview.redd.it/eh6whondqpsf1.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=4f7a36b39b1c65ebb30cf776ecbec5954c89cf31) Hilarious Family S1 (兰闺喜事 Lan Gui Xi Shi - [MDL link](https://mydramalist.com/715647-lai-gui-xi-shi)) tells the story of a mother and her four daughters as they navigate growing up and getting married. It does have some similarities to the setup of Netflix's Perfect Match (2025) - comedy where mildly impoverished widow moves to a bigger town to get her daughters married off - but they are quite different beasts. Liu Lin plays the harassed and put-upon Du Ruyu, whose patience is greatly tried by the quirks and oddities of her daughters - >!her eldest, aged 29 years and 16 months, is picky and materialistic and wants to marry rich; her second, a homebody who *doesn't* want to marry out; her third, an inflexible bookworm; and her fourth, an immature wannabe heroine (i.e. troublemaker).!< I'm only four episodes in so far, but I am absolutely loving it. The plot is full of hijinks, but the mood is mellow and mild. There's a fair bit of squabbling to drive the interpersonal conflicts, but it feels just like being in a room full of your favourite people - sometimes you get on each other's nerves, but at the end of the day it's all patched up with love. [This show is making me a big fan of Han Yun Yun \(R\) - she handles Jinrong so deftly that the character never tips over from annoying to aggravating, and she has had excellent comic chemistry with pretty much everyone else so far](https://preview.redd.it/4idorfabypsf1.png?width=660&format=png&auto=webp&s=e43d2c37cbc7b26787a1d2fa6b7afc45ee060ecc) I mean, they named the main male lead 路不平 (Lu Bu Ping), which translates literally to Uneven (rough) Road. And look at his character introduction! This gentle trolling is exactly how I might describe my siblings. It reminds me of a post I saw recently - [what is your sibling's contact name on your phone](https://www.reddit.com/r/CasualConversation/comments/1nt0rjq/what_is_your_siblings_contact_name_on_your_phone/) \- read some of the funnier anecdotes and tell me that isn't the same kind of humour! [Translation: he's a bit of a loser and he's gonna get in his own way more often than not](https://preview.redd.it/7tdof7ewzpsf1.png?width=1108&format=png&auto=webp&s=094b994a040370619f4d98b38c24106fb00f58f6) The opening song 《我想干啥就干啥》is a perfect match (hah) to this easygoing spirit. There's two versions listed in the OST, but my favourite is the one sung by 锤娜丽莎 Chui Na Li Sha, who also appears as a reoccurring minor character. I usually skip openings but I'd gladly sit through this one just to hear it every time. 我想笑了我就笑\~ This is a perfect show to unwind with when you're on the hellish commute to/from work, and I would be doing just that *if my phone hadn't manifested the green lines of death* (curse you, Samsung! \*shakes fist\*). It hasn't made me belly laugh yet, but each episode has left me with a warm heart and a wide grin, and I am absolutely looking forward to seeing how it will end.
16
7
Sunflowerwrites_3 days ago
Vibe Check
Mantis (movie) was a good watch.
Mantis (movie) was a good watch. There can be few aspects that I can give ratings, like casting was 10/10. The story frustrates me a little bit, but it is a decent watch, maybe because it is a spin-off movie, and I did not know that, so maybe I can feel a bit disconnected, but honestly, not that disconnected. So, story-wise, 6/10. The action scenes were really well choreographed, which would be 7/10. The pacing is good, I would say, and the acting is also 10/10. Especially from **Park Gyu Young**. I really, really like this actress, like, she steals the show for me every time. In Squid Games, in Sweet Home, in Nine Puzzles. I just love her. The other actors were really great too. It is just, Park Gyu Young really sticks out to me. The complaint from this story can be what they are trying to tell, cause there are lots of aspects in this. The main leads have a complicated relationship, and do they really overcome that? Cause I feel like they did, but couldn't quite understand. But the journey of how it became complicated, I really liked that. It is about superiority, power, and pride. It is just wanting to prove worth from the female lead's side, and to protect what you love from the male lead's side. Cause there is literally a dialogue where they go "protect what you love", but that love felt complicated, even sad at some points. So, from several perspectives, this could be a solid movie, just need to present it well. So, overall, 7/10 I would like to give this movie.
15
4
CombPsychological5073 days ago
Vibe Check
This show just reminded me how much I hate streaming services.
This show just reminded me how much I hate streaming services. Just finished my yearly Sopranos watch through, so naturally, its time to start Nurse Jackie again. Signed up for Paramount+ again, expecting it to be there in its Showtime section. Even google says its there! And of course, they hide the library behind a sign up splash screen, so you can't even actually check until you sign up. Shocker, its gone. I get blah blah streaming rights, but Jesus, if you're showtime and you own the show, at least reserve the damn right to always stream it yourself, even if it's going to Netflix for awhile. And what's up with the wait?? It's not like they have to drive the damn DVD's over from Paramount to Netflix, anticipation for a 10 year old show to come to Netflix?
15
13
Skyeis_uhh_overthere2 days ago
Vibe Check
I think I had an acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was so scary.
I think I had an acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was so scary. I think I had my third ever acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was really scary. Luckily it was much milder than the one that sent me to the ER, but still. It started the same as the other ones- as a regular migraine with aura, but after about an hour, I realized I couldn’t read the Reddit posts I was looking at anymore. I would try to read a sentence and each word was so hard to work out- I’d read the word with a lot manual effort but the meaning then wouldn’t make much sense, then I’d try to read the next word but when I tried to read it, a completely different random word would come out instead and that kept happening over and over. Everything became gibberish and it was impossible to comprehend written words. I was then trying to tell my partner what was happening and speaking out loud was similar, too. I was trying to communicate but the words I said didn’t make sense to me and random words kept popping up constantly which made everything so confusing and hard to keep track of. If I remember right, I managed to get out quite a few statements that made sense eventually, but not without having to reattempt the statements sometimes five times in a row. I would string a few words together, then the incessant random words would make me hit a wall or the words i was saying would just stop making any sense to me, so then I’d start back at the beginning and try again, and then again. I tried honing in on Kath and Kim which was playing on Netflix but everything was gibberish once again. Even when I wasn’t trying to speak, random words and strings of syllables were entering my mind and they all baffled me- what did any of it mean? I had no idea. It was so scary. After less than an hour, I gradually started to be able to make sense of things again. Words started making sense and the random words and syllables from inside my mind slowed down and then stopped. My migraine lasted many more hours but the confusional part was luckily short lived. But regardless, what the actual hell was any of that. It was so confusing and frightening. Has anyone else dealt with this or know someone who has?
11
0
ClaireRabbit13 days ago
Vibe Check
NO BAD WORD
NO BAD WORD BTW this same person used to like me but now hates me bc they listened to the shitty lies of some hater Also SO stands for Solar Opposites (me and my friend hate that show)
128
58
thiswitchslays2 days ago
Vibe Check
Here are the lines that were censored in Part II
Here are the lines that were censored in Part II For my loves watching season two on Netflix or through an adjacent streaming service, you have the copy originally intended for broadcast television. This means that unlike the “uncut” version that is exclusive to AMC+, yours includes the opening credits, blank spaces for ad breaks and a handful of changed lines that were reshot or voiced over to censor some of the swearing. While you’re not experiencing a major loss in content or anything, it’s still unfortunate, so I went and found *most* if not all of the line changes between the two versions of s2. I. *What Can the Damned Really Say to the Damned.* Lestat’s “I’m going to bloody kill you” should be “I’m going to fucking kill you.” II. Same episode. Claudia says “I forgave you for fucking up my plan” instead of the alternate “screwing up.” III. *Do You Know What It Means to Be Loved by Death.* While not from censorship, two lines have been cut for continuity around an ad break. When Daniel is mocking Louis with the telenovela theme, it’s supposed to go on playing over the following Paris flashback, causing Louis to get distracted and interrupt his story: “Can you turn off that music please?” to which Daniel goes, “yeah, sure.” But with the placement of an ad break in the middle it no longer works. IV. *No Pain.* Louis tells Armand, “I’m fucking tired of holding on to it.” They just omit the adverb. And then there’s Lestat referring to Armand as “mm, still a cunt?” instead of being forced to use a euphemism for it, “mm, still a bookbinder’s wife?” This one’s tragic. V. Same episode. Daniel gets a DM from Raglan James and says “fuck off.” VI. *I Could Not Prevent It,* Daniel wants Armand to confirm he “fucked over Louis, Claudia, and Madeleine” instead of the less cool “screwed over.” It’s so much spicier. Left out a few trivial instances, like a quick use of “fucking” from Santiago being replaced by “bloody” in episode 6. I don’t think there’s much else… other than I’m feeling a little gaslit for being made to swear up and down to my mother that “Lestat really *does* call Armand a cunt” after last night’s watch served bookbinder instead of cunt.
74
6
Larushka2 days ago
Vibe Check
Proof of Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta against the Wales’
Proof of Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta against the Wales’ This detailed post on X by HRHLadyJ really puts into perspective their recent attacks on the Wales. And their pro-Sussex stance. You have to wonder how much of this is fueled by the new Sussex PR team. ————— The Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta: A Month of Smears on William and Catherine In the sweltering heat of August and September 2025, the @DailyMail unleashed a torrent of vitriol against Prince William, Catherine, the Princess of Wales, and even King Charles III. What began as whispers about a family home move quickly snowballed into a full-scale assault: accusations of “control freak” tendencies, “underwhelming” duties, a “dark past” tied to slavery, and hints of irreparable rifts. Collages of headlines tell the story — dozens of pieces from the Mail’s royal “hit squad,” peddling speculation as fact, while royal watchers cried “propaganda!” after every drop. This wasn’t journalism. It was SEO warfare dressed up as reporting, cynically timed to ride search trends like “William lazy,” “Kate health,” and “Charles succession,” while dangling glowing comparisons to bait Sussex fans. The Mail’s royal desk has turned itself into a digital sweatshop where outrage is the currency. Every article is deliberately contradictory — William is “too private” one day, “too performative” the next; Catherine is “influential but holding him back”; Charles is “weak but meddling.” Why? Because conflict sells. Rage-clicks fill MailOnline’s coffers. It’s the business model of chaos — and chaos is the coin of their grubby little realm. Now, in a twist worthy of their own soap-opera scripts, two of the Mail’s most prolific royal scribblers— Rebecca English and Richard Eden —have pivoted to pearl-clutching exposés about a “sinister plot” and “calculated wedge” undermining William and Catherine. It’s laughable. These aren’t brave whistleblowers; they’re architects of the very narrative they’re now decrying. The Daily Mail didn’t just report the hate—they manufactured it, weaponised it, monetised it, and now want to wash their hands as if they were bystanders. It’s the Fleet Street equivalent of throwing petrol on a bonfire, then sobbing that one’s eyebrows got singed. The Mail’s hypocrisy is breathtaking. For weeks, they ran columns dripping with Sussex apologia — Griffiths acting as Harry’s stenographer and Platell recycling Meghan’s grievances as “concerns,” and A.N. Wilson psychoanalysing William from his study like some amateur Freud-for-hire. All this while YouTube commenters and even their own readers blasted their Royals channel as “toxic propaganda.” But rather than adjust course, they doubled down — until subscribers fled and advertisers grew squeamish. Only then did the pivot to victimhood begin. One could almost hear the gnashing of teeth in Kensington High Street. Let’s expose the rot at the heart of this tabloid machine — how they orchestrated the smears, gamed the algorithms, amplified Sussex narratives, twisted facts into weapons, and how their financial decline drives the cruelty. The curtain must be pulled back, and the stagehands caught red-handed, script in one hand, calculator in the other. The Hit Parade: A Catalogue of Calculated Cruelty From 1 August to 27 September 2025, the Daily Mail’s royal desk became a factory for anti-Wales ammunition, deploying a multi-pronged strategy: recycle old grudges into fresh headlines, cherry-pick data to misrepresent workloads, sensationalise historical trivia, and frame every decision as evidence of impending royal collapse. The trigger? William and Catherine’s pragmatic decision to relocate from Adelaide Cottage to Forest Lodge on the Sandringham estate — a “forever home” for family stability amid Catherine’s cancer recovery and global threats. What should have been a non-story morphed into “proof” of William’s fatal flaws: too private, too lazy, too “woke,” too everything. In short, too damned convenient for the Mail’s search engine tinkering. This was not random. The Mail runs on click-chains: one “exclusive” generates spinoffs, which are then linked in sidebars, ensuring readers never escape the outrage cycle. Eviction headlines lead into slavery history “revelations,” which link to workload hit pieces, which in turn promote YouTube debate clips. It is algorithmic entrapment sold as news — a kind of journalistic mousetrap baited with bile. Here’s the rogue’s gallery of the worst offenders, their pieces dripping with pro-Sussex favoritism and wild conjecture, broken down by tactic: • Amanda Platell (Columnist): On 20 August, Platell sneered at William’s “puny” 71 engagements, cherry-picking incomplete 2024 figures and ignoring health crises in the family. She compared him unfavourably to Princess Anne and accused him of making the Firm “pure vanilla.” Platell’s column was SEO-stuffed with phrases like “workshy heir” and “royal crisis” — all designed to trend on Google and bait shares. Her follow-ups even recycled Meghan’s old “baby brain” anecdote as if it were fresh ammunition. This isn’t journalism; it’s content farming — and farming in barren soil at that. • Christopher Wilson (Historian/Columnist): On 23 August, Wilson exhumed Forest Lodge’s “dark past,” weaponising obscure history to frame William and Catherine as morally negligent. The piece was algorithmically tied to MailOnline’s “slavery legacy” tag — the same tag used to cover Netflix’s colonial dramas. It wasn’t about informing readers; it was about capturing traffic off unrelated cultural debates. Like a ghoul rifling through parish records for sport. • A.N. Wilson (Royal Author): On 19 September, he declared William “angry and unhappy,” citing outdated stats and palace whispers. But more insidious was the Mail’s packaging: push alerts framed it as a “shock diagnosis,” with sidebars linking to Sussex puff pieces. William’s Earthshot success was buried, Harry’s “fun scamp” antics headlined. Manipulation by design, as brazen as a conjurer’s sleight of hand. • Charlotte Griffiths (Royal Correspondent): On 13 September, Griffiths painted William as the villain blocking Harry’s reconciliation. Her reliance on “anonymous sources” was classic Mail — unverifiable quotes crafted to fuel fan wars online. Each story was cross-promoted under MailOnline’s “Sussex comeback” hub, ensuring clicks from both sides of the aisle. Division is profitable, and she is its clerk of works. • Liz Jones (Columnist): On 5 September, Jones targeted Kate’s “bronde” hair during a visit to the Natural History Museum gardens, mixing sharp critique with grudging praise. Trolls called the lighter shade “washed out” or a “wig,” but Jones framed it as smart and empowering, signalling Kate’s post-cancer confidence. Her long history of nitpicking Kate’s hair — from 2012 bangs to post-2024 hospital styles — fits the pattern: personal opinion masquerading as insight, always driving clicks. She also recently editorialised against William as a future king, questioning his temperament and charisma, further stoking debate and subtly undermining the heir apparent. • Tina Brown (via Mail amplification): Brown’s Vanity Fair critiques were sliced into fragments and drip-fed as “Mail exclusives.” This is another trick: repackaging syndicated content as fresh scoops, maximising monetisation while disguising the recycling. In Fleet Street terms, it’s reheated cabbage passed off as coq au vin. • Rebecca English & Richard Eden: Even before their pivot, both poured fuel on the fire. English questioned the Forest Lodge move as a “taxpayer gamble” (24 September). Eden mocked it as indecisiveness (18 September). Both columns carried DailyMailPlus paywall teasers, designed to convert outrage into subscriptions. This wasn’t reporting. It was a coordinated content strategy: anonymous sourcing (cheap and unverifiable), data manipulation (engagement cherry-picking), and emotional framing (slavery, evictions, family rifts) — all calculated to maximise page dwell-time and comments. It’s the cynical mechanics of Fleet Street turned up to eleven, all brass band and no tune. The Asinine Pivot: From Smear-Mongers to Victimhood By late September, the Mail faced a problem: the narrative it had stoked was now boomeranging. Readers began calling out bias, subscribers fled, and Palace Confidential was haemorrhaging viewers. Cue the pivot. • On 25 September, Eden wailed about a “sinister plot.” • On 26 September, English warned of a “wedge between Charles and William.” Both pieces were smoke and mirrors. They rehashed earlier reporting — their own reporting — while pretending to be alarmed that anti-Wales narratives were spreading. Classic Mail: start the fire, then play the firefighter. They build the echo chamber, harvest the clicks, and when the backlash hits, shrug and blame “external forces.” It is not just hypocrisy — it is fraud. Fraud against readers, against journalism, against public trust. A betrayal wrapped in bunting. YouTube Implosion: Palace Confidential’s Monarchy Meltdown The nadir came mid-September when the Mail’s Palace Confidential channel speculated if William’s reign would “end the monarchy.” The video was a montage of the very print smears their own desk had churned out — workload cherry-picking, rift whispers, Forest Lodge doom-mongering. Within days, subscribers plummeted by the thousands. Comment sections filled with accusations of “hateful propaganda.” Forensic look at the analytics shows watch-time collapsing, click-through rates nosediving. Why? Because even Mail loyalists saw through the con. They were watching for the same reheated slop, dressed up as “exclusive debate.” According to VidIQ data, the Daily Mail Royals YouTube channel currently shows around 482,000 subscribers and has amassed over 313 million total video views. While those are nontrivial numbers, the channel’s estimated monthly earnings do not vindicate the hours of content churn — often in the modest range of £14,580–44,550 depending on viewership and ad engagement. In other words, the editorial excess is not being rewarded by proportionate audience loyalty or monetisation growth — the metrics are flat or weakening under scrutiny. Tubics data earlier in 2025 had placed the Daily Mail Royals subscriber count at ~464,000 with a view count ~292 million, indicating very slow growth — a channel in stagnation rather than ascendancy. This wasn’t content collapse; it was audience striking back. The vox populi spoke — and it said, enough. Follow the Money: The Mail’s Financial Desperation To understand why the Daily Mail behaves this way, you must follow the money. The pathology of smear campaigns is fed by urgent financial pressure. • Print decline: As of June 2025, the Daily Mail’s audited daily circulation stood at ~631,191 copies. That figure reflects a dramatic shrinkage over years — the paper, once selling well into multiple hundreds of thousands more, is now hollowed out. • Yearly comparisons: In 2024, ABC audit figures showed the Daily Mail had a daily circulation of 706,839 — meaning circulation has dropped by over 10% in roughly a year. • Advertiser exodus: In January 2025, the Mail announced it would merge its print and online teams and initiate cost-cutting, as major advertisers increasingly balk at brand adjacency with toxic, polarising content. The memo revealed that Mail+ (the paywall arm) had achieved 100,000 paying subscribers since its launch — a modest number given the scale of MailOnline’s reach. • Staff cuts as symptom: This internal restructuring is not optional — it is a forced retreat. Under the integration plan, job losses are anticipated. • Parent group pressure: DMG Media, the Mail’s owner, has made it clear that the print-online integration is about survival in a hostile advertising environment and declining print returns. In short, the Mail is bleeding. These royal smear campaigns aren’t just editorial cynicism — they’re a press outlet in full panic, scrabbling for clicks, subscriptions, and relevance by flogging scandal, outrage, and division. It’s the frantic thrashing of a swimmer who knows the tide has turned against them. Dirty Hands, No Excuses: Time to Hold the Mail Accountable The Daily Mail’s hands aren’t just dirty — they’re smeared, ink-stained with the fingerprints of manipulation. This wasn’t an accident, not a slip of the editorial pen. It was deliberate. They gamed algorithms like card sharks stacking a deck, pitted fandoms against one another like gladiators in the Coliseum, and weaponised history, health, and grief as if they were trinkets to be traded for clicks. @charlotteEaLMoS , @amandajplatell, A.N. Wilson, @TinaBrownLM, @LizJonesGoddess and the rest dutifully acted as stenographers for Sussex spin; @RE_DailyMail and @richardaeden cried about “plots” they themselves had stoked; and editors signed off on every exaggeration, knowing that rage pays the bills. And now, when the wind shifts, they dare pivot to victimhood — as if they were the collateral and not the culprits. It’s theatre. Bad theatre. And the damage? It’s carved into public trust like graffiti on a listed building. The contrast couldn’t be clearer. William and Catherine ride out the storm with quiet resilience, their 74% approval proving that duty and dignity still matter. The monarchy carries on; the Mail only carries on as long as division sells. Readers aren’t fooled. Legacy media is collapsing under the weight of its own duplicity. Advertisers abandoned The Sun after Hillsborough. News of the World collapsed after phone hacking. And the Daily Mail — drunk on its own poison — is staggering toward the same graveyard. This was never “just gossip.” It was calculated sabotage dressed up in broadsheet clothing, a smear campaign masquerading as reportage, a racket that hollowed out the very idea of journalism. They didn’t just observe events; they made them happen. They didn’t reflect public opinion; they twisted it. They didn’t hold power to account; they abused it. The case is closed. The Waleses endure — proof that quiet service and real substance always outlast scandal. The Mail’s hit squad, by contrast, are done. History won’t remember them as kingmakers, only as mercenaries who confused clickbait for craft and outrage for insight, and in the process wrote their own obituaries. They won’t go down as journalists; they’ll go down as clickbait casualties — yesterday’s men and women, swept away by the very tide they tried to ride. #BoycottDailyMail #WeAreTheMediaNow #RoyalSmearCampaign #ExposeTheMail #MediaManipulation #StopTheSpin #TabloidTyranny #FakeNewsFactory #MonarchyVsMedia #FleetStreetFraud #TruthOverClickbait #InkStainedLies
43
16
Important_Task_81793 days ago
Vibe Check
This has been reported, right?
This has been reported, right? Apologies if this is duplication. https://deadline.com/2025/10/the-ultimatum-queer-love-canceled-netflix-1236568742/
26
13
Sea_Atmosphere51053 days ago
Vibe Check
Season 3
Season 3 🖤✨ It’s official! Wednesday is coming back for Season 3 — and this time, the story is about to get even darker. Netflix has confirmed that the chilling new chapter will dive deeper into the Hyde mythology… with shocking twists, sinister secrets, and terrifying truths set to unravel at Nevermore Academy. 😱🔥 But how will Wednesday face the darkness that’s been haunting her since Season 2? And what hidden connections could change everything we thought we knew? 👀 Fans are already bracing for the most intense season yet…Details below 👇👇
18
6
Expert_Book_99833 days ago
Vibe Check
Troubled Teen Industry?
Troubled Teen Industry? I’m not sure if I’m remembering wrong (or maybe I just imagined it or saw it from another podcast) but has YWA done a dedicated episode on the “Troubled Teen Industry”? I just watched Mae Martin’s new Netflix miniseries ‘Wayward’ and it covers a lot of themes that I feel like You’re Wrong About has also discussed, mainly: - Recovered memory therapy and other discredited forms of therapy. - Moral panics about teens.
16
11
latefair3 days ago
Vibe Check
Hilarious Family S1 兰闺喜事 - cosy laughs
Hilarious Family S1 兰闺喜事 - cosy laughs [L-R: 4th sis Keling \(Li Jiaqi\), 3rd sis Banxia \(Wu Jiayi\), Du Ruyu \(Liu Lin\), 2nd sis Peilan \(Jackie Li\), 1st sis Jinrong \(Han Yun Yun\)](https://preview.redd.it/eh6whondqpsf1.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=4f7a36b39b1c65ebb30cf776ecbec5954c89cf31) Hilarious Family S1 (兰闺喜事 Lan Gui Xi Shi - [MDL link](https://mydramalist.com/715647-lai-gui-xi-shi)) tells the story of a mother and her four daughters as they navigate growing up and getting married. It does have some similarities to the setup of Netflix's Perfect Match (2025) - comedy where mildly impoverished widow moves to a bigger town to get her daughters married off - but they are quite different beasts. Liu Lin plays the harassed and put-upon Du Ruyu, whose patience is greatly tried by the quirks and oddities of her daughters - >!her eldest, aged 29 years and 16 months, is picky and materialistic and wants to marry rich; her second, a homebody who *doesn't* want to marry out; her third, an inflexible bookworm; and her fourth, an immature wannabe heroine (i.e. troublemaker).!< I'm only four episodes in so far, but I am absolutely loving it. The plot is full of hijinks, but the mood is mellow and mild. There's a fair bit of squabbling to drive the interpersonal conflicts, but it feels just like being in a room full of your favourite people - sometimes you get on each other's nerves, but at the end of the day it's all patched up with love. [This show is making me a big fan of Han Yun Yun \(R\) - she handles Jinrong so deftly that the character never tips over from annoying to aggravating, and she has had excellent comic chemistry with pretty much everyone else so far](https://preview.redd.it/4idorfabypsf1.png?width=660&format=png&auto=webp&s=e43d2c37cbc7b26787a1d2fa6b7afc45ee060ecc) I mean, they named the main male lead 路不平 (Lu Bu Ping), which translates literally to Uneven (rough) Road. And look at his character introduction! This gentle trolling is exactly how I might describe my siblings. It reminds me of a post I saw recently - [what is your sibling's contact name on your phone](https://www.reddit.com/r/CasualConversation/comments/1nt0rjq/what_is_your_siblings_contact_name_on_your_phone/) \- read some of the funnier anecdotes and tell me that isn't the same kind of humour! [Translation: he's a bit of a loser and he's gonna get in his own way more often than not](https://preview.redd.it/7tdof7ewzpsf1.png?width=1108&format=png&auto=webp&s=094b994a040370619f4d98b38c24106fb00f58f6) The opening song 《我想干啥就干啥》is a perfect match (hah) to this easygoing spirit. There's two versions listed in the OST, but my favourite is the one sung by 锤娜丽莎 Chui Na Li Sha, who also appears as a reoccurring minor character. I usually skip openings but I'd gladly sit through this one just to hear it every time. 我想笑了我就笑\~ This is a perfect show to unwind with when you're on the hellish commute to/from work, and I would be doing just that *if my phone hadn't manifested the green lines of death* (curse you, Samsung! \*shakes fist\*). It hasn't made me belly laugh yet, but each episode has left me with a warm heart and a wide grin, and I am absolutely looking forward to seeing how it will end.
16
7
Sunflowerwrites_3 days ago
Vibe Check
Mantis (movie) was a good watch.
Mantis (movie) was a good watch. There can be few aspects that I can give ratings, like casting was 10/10. The story frustrates me a little bit, but it is a decent watch, maybe because it is a spin-off movie, and I did not know that, so maybe I can feel a bit disconnected, but honestly, not that disconnected. So, story-wise, 6/10. The action scenes were really well choreographed, which would be 7/10. The pacing is good, I would say, and the acting is also 10/10. Especially from **Park Gyu Young**. I really, really like this actress, like, she steals the show for me every time. In Squid Games, in Sweet Home, in Nine Puzzles. I just love her. The other actors were really great too. It is just, Park Gyu Young really sticks out to me. The complaint from this story can be what they are trying to tell, cause there are lots of aspects in this. The main leads have a complicated relationship, and do they really overcome that? Cause I feel like they did, but couldn't quite understand. But the journey of how it became complicated, I really liked that. It is about superiority, power, and pride. It is just wanting to prove worth from the female lead's side, and to protect what you love from the male lead's side. Cause there is literally a dialogue where they go "protect what you love", but that love felt complicated, even sad at some points. So, from several perspectives, this could be a solid movie, just need to present it well. So, overall, 7/10 I would like to give this movie.
15
4
CombPsychological5073 days ago
Vibe Check
This show just reminded me how much I hate streaming services.
This show just reminded me how much I hate streaming services. Just finished my yearly Sopranos watch through, so naturally, its time to start Nurse Jackie again. Signed up for Paramount+ again, expecting it to be there in its Showtime section. Even google says its there! And of course, they hide the library behind a sign up splash screen, so you can't even actually check until you sign up. Shocker, its gone. I get blah blah streaming rights, but Jesus, if you're showtime and you own the show, at least reserve the damn right to always stream it yourself, even if it's going to Netflix for awhile. And what's up with the wait?? It's not like they have to drive the damn DVD's over from Paramount to Netflix, anticipation for a 10 year old show to come to Netflix?
15
13
Skyeis_uhh_overthere2 days ago
Vibe Check
I think I had an acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was so scary.
I think I had an acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was so scary. I think I had my third ever acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was really scary. Luckily it was much milder than the one that sent me to the ER, but still. It started the same as the other ones- as a regular migraine with aura, but after about an hour, I realized I couldn’t read the Reddit posts I was looking at anymore. I would try to read a sentence and each word was so hard to work out- I’d read the word with a lot manual effort but the meaning then wouldn’t make much sense, then I’d try to read the next word but when I tried to read it, a completely different random word would come out instead and that kept happening over and over. Everything became gibberish and it was impossible to comprehend written words. I was then trying to tell my partner what was happening and speaking out loud was similar, too. I was trying to communicate but the words I said didn’t make sense to me and random words kept popping up constantly which made everything so confusing and hard to keep track of. If I remember right, I managed to get out quite a few statements that made sense eventually, but not without having to reattempt the statements sometimes five times in a row. I would string a few words together, then the incessant random words would make me hit a wall or the words i was saying would just stop making any sense to me, so then I’d start back at the beginning and try again, and then again. I tried honing in on Kath and Kim which was playing on Netflix but everything was gibberish once again. Even when I wasn’t trying to speak, random words and strings of syllables were entering my mind and they all baffled me- what did any of it mean? I had no idea. It was so scary. After less than an hour, I gradually started to be able to make sense of things again. Words started making sense and the random words and syllables from inside my mind slowed down and then stopped. My migraine lasted many more hours but the confusional part was luckily short lived. But regardless, what the actual hell was any of that. It was so confusing and frightening. Has anyone else dealt with this or know someone who has?
11
0
ClaireRabbit13 days ago
Vibe Check
NO BAD WORD
NO BAD WORD BTW this same person used to like me but now hates me bc they listened to the shitty lies of some hater Also SO stands for Solar Opposites (me and my friend hate that show)
128
58
thiswitchslays2 days ago
Vibe Check
Here are the lines that were censored in Part II
Here are the lines that were censored in Part II For my loves watching season two on Netflix or through an adjacent streaming service, you have the copy originally intended for broadcast television. This means that unlike the “uncut” version that is exclusive to AMC+, yours includes the opening credits, blank spaces for ad breaks and a handful of changed lines that were reshot or voiced over to censor some of the swearing. While you’re not experiencing a major loss in content or anything, it’s still unfortunate, so I went and found *most* if not all of the line changes between the two versions of s2. I. *What Can the Damned Really Say to the Damned.* Lestat’s “I’m going to bloody kill you” should be “I’m going to fucking kill you.” II. Same episode. Claudia says “I forgave you for fucking up my plan” instead of the alternate “screwing up.” III. *Do You Know What It Means to Be Loved by Death.* While not from censorship, two lines have been cut for continuity around an ad break. When Daniel is mocking Louis with the telenovela theme, it’s supposed to go on playing over the following Paris flashback, causing Louis to get distracted and interrupt his story: “Can you turn off that music please?” to which Daniel goes, “yeah, sure.” But with the placement of an ad break in the middle it no longer works. IV. *No Pain.* Louis tells Armand, “I’m fucking tired of holding on to it.” They just omit the adverb. And then there’s Lestat referring to Armand as “mm, still a cunt?” instead of being forced to use a euphemism for it, “mm, still a bookbinder’s wife?” This one’s tragic. V. Same episode. Daniel gets a DM from Raglan James and says “fuck off.” VI. *I Could Not Prevent It,* Daniel wants Armand to confirm he “fucked over Louis, Claudia, and Madeleine” instead of the less cool “screwed over.” It’s so much spicier. Left out a few trivial instances, like a quick use of “fucking” from Santiago being replaced by “bloody” in episode 6. I don’t think there’s much else… other than I’m feeling a little gaslit for being made to swear up and down to my mother that “Lestat really *does* call Armand a cunt” after last night’s watch served bookbinder instead of cunt.
74
6
Larushka2 days ago
Vibe Check
Proof of Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta against the Wales’
Proof of Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta against the Wales’ This detailed post on X by HRHLadyJ really puts into perspective their recent attacks on the Wales. And their pro-Sussex stance. You have to wonder how much of this is fueled by the new Sussex PR team. ————— The Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta: A Month of Smears on William and Catherine In the sweltering heat of August and September 2025, the @DailyMail unleashed a torrent of vitriol against Prince William, Catherine, the Princess of Wales, and even King Charles III. What began as whispers about a family home move quickly snowballed into a full-scale assault: accusations of “control freak” tendencies, “underwhelming” duties, a “dark past” tied to slavery, and hints of irreparable rifts. Collages of headlines tell the story — dozens of pieces from the Mail’s royal “hit squad,” peddling speculation as fact, while royal watchers cried “propaganda!” after every drop. This wasn’t journalism. It was SEO warfare dressed up as reporting, cynically timed to ride search trends like “William lazy,” “Kate health,” and “Charles succession,” while dangling glowing comparisons to bait Sussex fans. The Mail’s royal desk has turned itself into a digital sweatshop where outrage is the currency. Every article is deliberately contradictory — William is “too private” one day, “too performative” the next; Catherine is “influential but holding him back”; Charles is “weak but meddling.” Why? Because conflict sells. Rage-clicks fill MailOnline’s coffers. It’s the business model of chaos — and chaos is the coin of their grubby little realm. Now, in a twist worthy of their own soap-opera scripts, two of the Mail’s most prolific royal scribblers— Rebecca English and Richard Eden —have pivoted to pearl-clutching exposés about a “sinister plot” and “calculated wedge” undermining William and Catherine. It’s laughable. These aren’t brave whistleblowers; they’re architects of the very narrative they’re now decrying. The Daily Mail didn’t just report the hate—they manufactured it, weaponised it, monetised it, and now want to wash their hands as if they were bystanders. It’s the Fleet Street equivalent of throwing petrol on a bonfire, then sobbing that one’s eyebrows got singed. The Mail’s hypocrisy is breathtaking. For weeks, they ran columns dripping with Sussex apologia — Griffiths acting as Harry’s stenographer and Platell recycling Meghan’s grievances as “concerns,” and A.N. Wilson psychoanalysing William from his study like some amateur Freud-for-hire. All this while YouTube commenters and even their own readers blasted their Royals channel as “toxic propaganda.” But rather than adjust course, they doubled down — until subscribers fled and advertisers grew squeamish. Only then did the pivot to victimhood begin. One could almost hear the gnashing of teeth in Kensington High Street. Let’s expose the rot at the heart of this tabloid machine — how they orchestrated the smears, gamed the algorithms, amplified Sussex narratives, twisted facts into weapons, and how their financial decline drives the cruelty. The curtain must be pulled back, and the stagehands caught red-handed, script in one hand, calculator in the other. The Hit Parade: A Catalogue of Calculated Cruelty From 1 August to 27 September 2025, the Daily Mail’s royal desk became a factory for anti-Wales ammunition, deploying a multi-pronged strategy: recycle old grudges into fresh headlines, cherry-pick data to misrepresent workloads, sensationalise historical trivia, and frame every decision as evidence of impending royal collapse. The trigger? William and Catherine’s pragmatic decision to relocate from Adelaide Cottage to Forest Lodge on the Sandringham estate — a “forever home” for family stability amid Catherine’s cancer recovery and global threats. What should have been a non-story morphed into “proof” of William’s fatal flaws: too private, too lazy, too “woke,” too everything. In short, too damned convenient for the Mail’s search engine tinkering. This was not random. The Mail runs on click-chains: one “exclusive” generates spinoffs, which are then linked in sidebars, ensuring readers never escape the outrage cycle. Eviction headlines lead into slavery history “revelations,” which link to workload hit pieces, which in turn promote YouTube debate clips. It is algorithmic entrapment sold as news — a kind of journalistic mousetrap baited with bile. Here’s the rogue’s gallery of the worst offenders, their pieces dripping with pro-Sussex favoritism and wild conjecture, broken down by tactic: • Amanda Platell (Columnist): On 20 August, Platell sneered at William’s “puny” 71 engagements, cherry-picking incomplete 2024 figures and ignoring health crises in the family. She compared him unfavourably to Princess Anne and accused him of making the Firm “pure vanilla.” Platell’s column was SEO-stuffed with phrases like “workshy heir” and “royal crisis” — all designed to trend on Google and bait shares. Her follow-ups even recycled Meghan’s old “baby brain” anecdote as if it were fresh ammunition. This isn’t journalism; it’s content farming — and farming in barren soil at that. • Christopher Wilson (Historian/Columnist): On 23 August, Wilson exhumed Forest Lodge’s “dark past,” weaponising obscure history to frame William and Catherine as morally negligent. The piece was algorithmically tied to MailOnline’s “slavery legacy” tag — the same tag used to cover Netflix’s colonial dramas. It wasn’t about informing readers; it was about capturing traffic off unrelated cultural debates. Like a ghoul rifling through parish records for sport. • A.N. Wilson (Royal Author): On 19 September, he declared William “angry and unhappy,” citing outdated stats and palace whispers. But more insidious was the Mail’s packaging: push alerts framed it as a “shock diagnosis,” with sidebars linking to Sussex puff pieces. William’s Earthshot success was buried, Harry’s “fun scamp” antics headlined. Manipulation by design, as brazen as a conjurer’s sleight of hand. • Charlotte Griffiths (Royal Correspondent): On 13 September, Griffiths painted William as the villain blocking Harry’s reconciliation. Her reliance on “anonymous sources” was classic Mail — unverifiable quotes crafted to fuel fan wars online. Each story was cross-promoted under MailOnline’s “Sussex comeback” hub, ensuring clicks from both sides of the aisle. Division is profitable, and she is its clerk of works. • Liz Jones (Columnist): On 5 September, Jones targeted Kate’s “bronde” hair during a visit to the Natural History Museum gardens, mixing sharp critique with grudging praise. Trolls called the lighter shade “washed out” or a “wig,” but Jones framed it as smart and empowering, signalling Kate’s post-cancer confidence. Her long history of nitpicking Kate’s hair — from 2012 bangs to post-2024 hospital styles — fits the pattern: personal opinion masquerading as insight, always driving clicks. She also recently editorialised against William as a future king, questioning his temperament and charisma, further stoking debate and subtly undermining the heir apparent. • Tina Brown (via Mail amplification): Brown’s Vanity Fair critiques were sliced into fragments and drip-fed as “Mail exclusives.” This is another trick: repackaging syndicated content as fresh scoops, maximising monetisation while disguising the recycling. In Fleet Street terms, it’s reheated cabbage passed off as coq au vin. • Rebecca English & Richard Eden: Even before their pivot, both poured fuel on the fire. English questioned the Forest Lodge move as a “taxpayer gamble” (24 September). Eden mocked it as indecisiveness (18 September). Both columns carried DailyMailPlus paywall teasers, designed to convert outrage into subscriptions. This wasn’t reporting. It was a coordinated content strategy: anonymous sourcing (cheap and unverifiable), data manipulation (engagement cherry-picking), and emotional framing (slavery, evictions, family rifts) — all calculated to maximise page dwell-time and comments. It’s the cynical mechanics of Fleet Street turned up to eleven, all brass band and no tune. The Asinine Pivot: From Smear-Mongers to Victimhood By late September, the Mail faced a problem: the narrative it had stoked was now boomeranging. Readers began calling out bias, subscribers fled, and Palace Confidential was haemorrhaging viewers. Cue the pivot. • On 25 September, Eden wailed about a “sinister plot.” • On 26 September, English warned of a “wedge between Charles and William.” Both pieces were smoke and mirrors. They rehashed earlier reporting — their own reporting — while pretending to be alarmed that anti-Wales narratives were spreading. Classic Mail: start the fire, then play the firefighter. They build the echo chamber, harvest the clicks, and when the backlash hits, shrug and blame “external forces.” It is not just hypocrisy — it is fraud. Fraud against readers, against journalism, against public trust. A betrayal wrapped in bunting. YouTube Implosion: Palace Confidential’s Monarchy Meltdown The nadir came mid-September when the Mail’s Palace Confidential channel speculated if William’s reign would “end the monarchy.” The video was a montage of the very print smears their own desk had churned out — workload cherry-picking, rift whispers, Forest Lodge doom-mongering. Within days, subscribers plummeted by the thousands. Comment sections filled with accusations of “hateful propaganda.” Forensic look at the analytics shows watch-time collapsing, click-through rates nosediving. Why? Because even Mail loyalists saw through the con. They were watching for the same reheated slop, dressed up as “exclusive debate.” According to VidIQ data, the Daily Mail Royals YouTube channel currently shows around 482,000 subscribers and has amassed over 313 million total video views. While those are nontrivial numbers, the channel’s estimated monthly earnings do not vindicate the hours of content churn — often in the modest range of £14,580–44,550 depending on viewership and ad engagement. In other words, the editorial excess is not being rewarded by proportionate audience loyalty or monetisation growth — the metrics are flat or weakening under scrutiny. Tubics data earlier in 2025 had placed the Daily Mail Royals subscriber count at ~464,000 with a view count ~292 million, indicating very slow growth — a channel in stagnation rather than ascendancy. This wasn’t content collapse; it was audience striking back. The vox populi spoke — and it said, enough. Follow the Money: The Mail’s Financial Desperation To understand why the Daily Mail behaves this way, you must follow the money. The pathology of smear campaigns is fed by urgent financial pressure. • Print decline: As of June 2025, the Daily Mail’s audited daily circulation stood at ~631,191 copies. That figure reflects a dramatic shrinkage over years — the paper, once selling well into multiple hundreds of thousands more, is now hollowed out. • Yearly comparisons: In 2024, ABC audit figures showed the Daily Mail had a daily circulation of 706,839 — meaning circulation has dropped by over 10% in roughly a year. • Advertiser exodus: In January 2025, the Mail announced it would merge its print and online teams and initiate cost-cutting, as major advertisers increasingly balk at brand adjacency with toxic, polarising content. The memo revealed that Mail+ (the paywall arm) had achieved 100,000 paying subscribers since its launch — a modest number given the scale of MailOnline’s reach. • Staff cuts as symptom: This internal restructuring is not optional — it is a forced retreat. Under the integration plan, job losses are anticipated. • Parent group pressure: DMG Media, the Mail’s owner, has made it clear that the print-online integration is about survival in a hostile advertising environment and declining print returns. In short, the Mail is bleeding. These royal smear campaigns aren’t just editorial cynicism — they’re a press outlet in full panic, scrabbling for clicks, subscriptions, and relevance by flogging scandal, outrage, and division. It’s the frantic thrashing of a swimmer who knows the tide has turned against them. Dirty Hands, No Excuses: Time to Hold the Mail Accountable The Daily Mail’s hands aren’t just dirty — they’re smeared, ink-stained with the fingerprints of manipulation. This wasn’t an accident, not a slip of the editorial pen. It was deliberate. They gamed algorithms like card sharks stacking a deck, pitted fandoms against one another like gladiators in the Coliseum, and weaponised history, health, and grief as if they were trinkets to be traded for clicks. @charlotteEaLMoS , @amandajplatell, A.N. Wilson, @TinaBrownLM, @LizJonesGoddess and the rest dutifully acted as stenographers for Sussex spin; @RE_DailyMail and @richardaeden cried about “plots” they themselves had stoked; and editors signed off on every exaggeration, knowing that rage pays the bills. And now, when the wind shifts, they dare pivot to victimhood — as if they were the collateral and not the culprits. It’s theatre. Bad theatre. And the damage? It’s carved into public trust like graffiti on a listed building. The contrast couldn’t be clearer. William and Catherine ride out the storm with quiet resilience, their 74% approval proving that duty and dignity still matter. The monarchy carries on; the Mail only carries on as long as division sells. Readers aren’t fooled. Legacy media is collapsing under the weight of its own duplicity. Advertisers abandoned The Sun after Hillsborough. News of the World collapsed after phone hacking. And the Daily Mail — drunk on its own poison — is staggering toward the same graveyard. This was never “just gossip.” It was calculated sabotage dressed up in broadsheet clothing, a smear campaign masquerading as reportage, a racket that hollowed out the very idea of journalism. They didn’t just observe events; they made them happen. They didn’t reflect public opinion; they twisted it. They didn’t hold power to account; they abused it. The case is closed. The Waleses endure — proof that quiet service and real substance always outlast scandal. The Mail’s hit squad, by contrast, are done. History won’t remember them as kingmakers, only as mercenaries who confused clickbait for craft and outrage for insight, and in the process wrote their own obituaries. They won’t go down as journalists; they’ll go down as clickbait casualties — yesterday’s men and women, swept away by the very tide they tried to ride. #BoycottDailyMail #WeAreTheMediaNow #RoyalSmearCampaign #ExposeTheMail #MediaManipulation #StopTheSpin #TabloidTyranny #FakeNewsFactory #MonarchyVsMedia #FleetStreetFraud #TruthOverClickbait #InkStainedLies
43
16
Important_Task_81793 days ago
Vibe Check
This has been reported, right?
This has been reported, right? Apologies if this is duplication. https://deadline.com/2025/10/the-ultimatum-queer-love-canceled-netflix-1236568742/
26
13
Sea_Atmosphere51053 days ago
Vibe Check
Season 3
Season 3 🖤✨ It’s official! Wednesday is coming back for Season 3 — and this time, the story is about to get even darker. Netflix has confirmed that the chilling new chapter will dive deeper into the Hyde mythology… with shocking twists, sinister secrets, and terrifying truths set to unravel at Nevermore Academy. 😱🔥 But how will Wednesday face the darkness that’s been haunting her since Season 2? And what hidden connections could change everything we thought we knew? 👀 Fans are already bracing for the most intense season yet…Details below 👇👇
18
6
Expert_Book_99833 days ago
Vibe Check
Troubled Teen Industry?
Troubled Teen Industry? I’m not sure if I’m remembering wrong (or maybe I just imagined it or saw it from another podcast) but has YWA done a dedicated episode on the “Troubled Teen Industry”? I just watched Mae Martin’s new Netflix miniseries ‘Wayward’ and it covers a lot of themes that I feel like You’re Wrong About has also discussed, mainly: - Recovered memory therapy and other discredited forms of therapy. - Moral panics about teens.
16
11
latefair3 days ago
Vibe Check
Hilarious Family S1 兰闺喜事 - cosy laughs
Hilarious Family S1 兰闺喜事 - cosy laughs [L-R: 4th sis Keling \(Li Jiaqi\), 3rd sis Banxia \(Wu Jiayi\), Du Ruyu \(Liu Lin\), 2nd sis Peilan \(Jackie Li\), 1st sis Jinrong \(Han Yun Yun\)](https://preview.redd.it/eh6whondqpsf1.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=4f7a36b39b1c65ebb30cf776ecbec5954c89cf31) Hilarious Family S1 (兰闺喜事 Lan Gui Xi Shi - [MDL link](https://mydramalist.com/715647-lai-gui-xi-shi)) tells the story of a mother and her four daughters as they navigate growing up and getting married. It does have some similarities to the setup of Netflix's Perfect Match (2025) - comedy where mildly impoverished widow moves to a bigger town to get her daughters married off - but they are quite different beasts. Liu Lin plays the harassed and put-upon Du Ruyu, whose patience is greatly tried by the quirks and oddities of her daughters - >!her eldest, aged 29 years and 16 months, is picky and materialistic and wants to marry rich; her second, a homebody who *doesn't* want to marry out; her third, an inflexible bookworm; and her fourth, an immature wannabe heroine (i.e. troublemaker).!< I'm only four episodes in so far, but I am absolutely loving it. The plot is full of hijinks, but the mood is mellow and mild. There's a fair bit of squabbling to drive the interpersonal conflicts, but it feels just like being in a room full of your favourite people - sometimes you get on each other's nerves, but at the end of the day it's all patched up with love. [This show is making me a big fan of Han Yun Yun \(R\) - she handles Jinrong so deftly that the character never tips over from annoying to aggravating, and she has had excellent comic chemistry with pretty much everyone else so far](https://preview.redd.it/4idorfabypsf1.png?width=660&format=png&auto=webp&s=e43d2c37cbc7b26787a1d2fa6b7afc45ee060ecc) I mean, they named the main male lead 路不平 (Lu Bu Ping), which translates literally to Uneven (rough) Road. And look at his character introduction! This gentle trolling is exactly how I might describe my siblings. It reminds me of a post I saw recently - [what is your sibling's contact name on your phone](https://www.reddit.com/r/CasualConversation/comments/1nt0rjq/what_is_your_siblings_contact_name_on_your_phone/) \- read some of the funnier anecdotes and tell me that isn't the same kind of humour! [Translation: he's a bit of a loser and he's gonna get in his own way more often than not](https://preview.redd.it/7tdof7ewzpsf1.png?width=1108&format=png&auto=webp&s=094b994a040370619f4d98b38c24106fb00f58f6) The opening song 《我想干啥就干啥》is a perfect match (hah) to this easygoing spirit. There's two versions listed in the OST, but my favourite is the one sung by 锤娜丽莎 Chui Na Li Sha, who also appears as a reoccurring minor character. I usually skip openings but I'd gladly sit through this one just to hear it every time. 我想笑了我就笑\~ This is a perfect show to unwind with when you're on the hellish commute to/from work, and I would be doing just that *if my phone hadn't manifested the green lines of death* (curse you, Samsung! \*shakes fist\*). It hasn't made me belly laugh yet, but each episode has left me with a warm heart and a wide grin, and I am absolutely looking forward to seeing how it will end.
16
7
Sunflowerwrites_3 days ago
Vibe Check
Mantis (movie) was a good watch.
Mantis (movie) was a good watch. There can be few aspects that I can give ratings, like casting was 10/10. The story frustrates me a little bit, but it is a decent watch, maybe because it is a spin-off movie, and I did not know that, so maybe I can feel a bit disconnected, but honestly, not that disconnected. So, story-wise, 6/10. The action scenes were really well choreographed, which would be 7/10. The pacing is good, I would say, and the acting is also 10/10. Especially from **Park Gyu Young**. I really, really like this actress, like, she steals the show for me every time. In Squid Games, in Sweet Home, in Nine Puzzles. I just love her. The other actors were really great too. It is just, Park Gyu Young really sticks out to me. The complaint from this story can be what they are trying to tell, cause there are lots of aspects in this. The main leads have a complicated relationship, and do they really overcome that? Cause I feel like they did, but couldn't quite understand. But the journey of how it became complicated, I really liked that. It is about superiority, power, and pride. It is just wanting to prove worth from the female lead's side, and to protect what you love from the male lead's side. Cause there is literally a dialogue where they go "protect what you love", but that love felt complicated, even sad at some points. So, from several perspectives, this could be a solid movie, just need to present it well. So, overall, 7/10 I would like to give this movie.
15
4
CombPsychological5073 days ago
Vibe Check
This show just reminded me how much I hate streaming services.
This show just reminded me how much I hate streaming services. Just finished my yearly Sopranos watch through, so naturally, its time to start Nurse Jackie again. Signed up for Paramount+ again, expecting it to be there in its Showtime section. Even google says its there! And of course, they hide the library behind a sign up splash screen, so you can't even actually check until you sign up. Shocker, its gone. I get blah blah streaming rights, but Jesus, if you're showtime and you own the show, at least reserve the damn right to always stream it yourself, even if it's going to Netflix for awhile. And what's up with the wait?? It's not like they have to drive the damn DVD's over from Paramount to Netflix, anticipation for a 10 year old show to come to Netflix?
15
13
Skyeis_uhh_overthere2 days ago
Vibe Check
I think I had an acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was so scary.
I think I had an acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was so scary. I think I had my third ever acute confusional migraine yesterday and it was really scary. Luckily it was much milder than the one that sent me to the ER, but still. It started the same as the other ones- as a regular migraine with aura, but after about an hour, I realized I couldn’t read the Reddit posts I was looking at anymore. I would try to read a sentence and each word was so hard to work out- I’d read the word with a lot manual effort but the meaning then wouldn’t make much sense, then I’d try to read the next word but when I tried to read it, a completely different random word would come out instead and that kept happening over and over. Everything became gibberish and it was impossible to comprehend written words. I was then trying to tell my partner what was happening and speaking out loud was similar, too. I was trying to communicate but the words I said didn’t make sense to me and random words kept popping up constantly which made everything so confusing and hard to keep track of. If I remember right, I managed to get out quite a few statements that made sense eventually, but not without having to reattempt the statements sometimes five times in a row. I would string a few words together, then the incessant random words would make me hit a wall or the words i was saying would just stop making any sense to me, so then I’d start back at the beginning and try again, and then again. I tried honing in on Kath and Kim which was playing on Netflix but everything was gibberish once again. Even when I wasn’t trying to speak, random words and strings of syllables were entering my mind and they all baffled me- what did any of it mean? I had no idea. It was so scary. After less than an hour, I gradually started to be able to make sense of things again. Words started making sense and the random words and syllables from inside my mind slowed down and then stopped. My migraine lasted many more hours but the confusional part was luckily short lived. But regardless, what the actual hell was any of that. It was so confusing and frightening. Has anyone else dealt with this or know someone who has?
11
0
Hyxenflay7737_45653 days ago
Vibe Check
I had a bot taken down that just had the same name as a Disney character
I had a bot taken down that just had the same name as a Disney character I had a Jungle Book bot up that was from a movie adaption not made by Disney—characters had the same names. It’s a 2018 film on Netflix and had nothing to do with any of the Disney versions. And it got taken down. Really annoyed, honestly. I get the DMCA thing, but it literally wasn’t even a Disney thing.
7
5
esnupiland3 days ago
Vibe Check
Which should I watch first?
Which should I watch first? Hi everyone, here’s a list of my recommended anime’s from reddit, friends, etc. Which should I watch first? Currently watching: Fruits Basket and Frieren. I like all genres! Anime’s I’ve seen: - [ ] attack on titan (11/10) - [ ] demon slayer (10/10) - [ ] yona of the dawn (11/10) - [ ] my happy marriage (9/10) - [ ] the fragrant flower blooms with dignity (8/10) - [ ] ouran high school host club (9/10) - [ ] jujitsu kaisen (started) - [ ] apothecary diaries (9/10) - [ ] black butler (7/10, never finished) - [ ] a sign of affection (8/10) - [ ] avatar the last airbender (11/10 Animes I have yet to watch: - [ ] fruits basket (crunchy roll) - [ ] maid sama (disney+) - [ ] violet evergarden (netflix) - [ ] frieren (netflix) - [ ] more than a married couple but not lovers (crunchy roll) - [ ] kamisama kiss (crunchy roll or disney+) - [ ] a girl and her guard dog (crunchy roll) - [ ] i want to eat your pancreas - [ ] 7th time loop (crunchy roll) - [ ] romantic killer (netflix) - [ ] snow white with the red hair (crunchy roll) - [ ] erased (crunchy roll) - [ ] death note (netflix) - [ ] vinland saga (netflix) - [ ] ice guy and his cool female colleague (crunchy roll) - [ ] honey lemon soda (crunchy roll) - [ ] the gorilla god’s go-to girl (crunchy roll) - [ ] attack on titan jr high (crunchy roll) - [ ] full metal brotherhood (crunchy roll) - [ ] kill la kill - [ ] spy x family (crunchy roll) - [ ] jjk (netflix) - [ ] banana fish (crunchy roll ?) - [ ] 86 (crunchy roll) - [ ] buddy daddies - [ ] rokka no yuusha - [ ] the rising of the shield hero
3
15
Minimum-Guard-57102 days ago
Vibe Check
32 [F4M] British girl looking for something extraordinary 💫
32 [F4M] British girl looking for something extraordinary 💫 🩷 Me: 32, British, brunette, green eyes, plus size, 5ft 7. Friendly, creative, smiley, active, generous, spontaneous, affectionate. Leo. ENFJ. Single mum. Beyoncé fan. Really cool. 🩵 You: Older than me. Attentive, open, fun and energetic. Willing to share photos and selfies right away. (Sorry that you apparently got blackmailed back in 2016 but I can’t bond with a picture of your car/chin/cat) Bonus points for dog dads, real dads, well groomed beards, similar time zones and great accents! 💛 Us: Online but open to IRL if it works! Let’s swap pictures, selfies, videos regularly, and I won’t try to sell you anything! I’ll show you pictures of my pet dog, the dress I’m wearing that day, the wild deer and foxes outside my house, and the food I cook! I’ll video all you at 2am when you’re sad, recommend music I think you’d like, and share my incredible chocolate chip cookie recipe with you. Let’s watch Netflix shows together. Let me doodle inappropriate sketches while I’m in meetings and send them to you. I’ll send you voice messages to wake up to, share pictures of things that make me think of you, and tell you how hot you look when you just wake up all scruffy and sleepy. I’ll let you rant about your annoying colleague, help you pick out a new tie for that interview, flirt a little to keep us smiling, and be the best pocket pal you never knew you needed. To be very honest, I want to fall in love and be adorable best friends that maybe flirt together sometimes 😅 maybe we are soulmates and meet and never look back. Maybe we find a steady friend who can have each others back for years to come. I don’t know! Find out with me!
3
1
jlo1173 days ago
Vibe Check
Cassandra Coleman's new song "Bite My Tongue" is featured in Season 2 of Netflix's Nobody Wants This
Cassandra Coleman's new song "Bite My Tongue" is featured in Season 2 of Netflix's Nobody Wants This [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZReOxA5MA6I](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZReOxA5MA6I)
2
0
jamiestar92 days ago
Vibe Check
CNBC Sport: What to expect as a Paramount bid for WBD looms
CNBC Sport: What to expect as a Paramount bid for WBD looms All deals, big or small, need a willing buyer and a willing seller. Paramount is preparing a bid to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, CNBC reported several weeks ago. The question for Warner Bros. Discovery Chief Executive Officer David Zaslav and his board will be whether to accept Paramount’s bid or to wait and move forward with a planned splitting of the company into two – a linear cable networks-driven entity called Discovery Global and a studio and streaming service firm to be called Warner Bros. If Paramount and WBD agree to a transaction, it would create a media and sports behemoth, bringing together TNT Sports and CBS Sports. March Madness would be united under one corporate roof. While a combined company still wouldn’t have NBA rights, after Warner Bros. Discovery failed to secure them in the league’s most recent TV deal beginning this upcoming season, it would have the NFL, MLB, NHL, some college football, UFC, NASCAR and much more. In other words, it would be a sports giant not quite the size of ESPN, but pretty close to NBCUniversal. A tie-up would be enormous in scale and in dollars. Warner Bros. Discovery is currently trading at around $19 a share, giving the company a market capitalization of $47 billion. Add another $30 billion in net debt and an additional takeover premium, and we’re talking about a transaction that could reach $90 billion. My colleague David Faber reported last month a bid could come in between $22 and $24 a share. I’m sure Zaslav will push for even more. Zaslav’s leverage is that he and the board believe there could be a bidding war for the Warner Bros. assets that will lift the value so high as to make Paramount’s bid for the entire company seem undervalued. Zaslav has told others that companies like Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Comcast could be interested in the studios and streaming business, according to people familiar with the matter, and he might be right. HBO and Warner Bros. studio would fit nicely with any of those companies. Paramount probably wants to avoid a bidding war, which could force the world’s second-wealthiest person and would-be-backer Larry Ellison’s hand into making an aggressive bid for the company before it splits into two. Companies such as Netflix, Apple and Amazon aren’t interested in owning legacy media assets like cable networks. Paramount, on the other hand, would have synergies by clumping its cable networks together with Warner’s for added distribution heft with pay TV providers. A combined company could keep the networks for the cash flow and the sports rights, or it could eventually split them off like Warner Bros. Discovery had planned. There’s another reason Paramount may want to move early, I’m told. The Skydance-Paramount merger ended up taking longer than expected after the FCC dragged its feet on approving a deal until after a “60 Minutes” settlement yielded $16 million to President Donald Trump. During that time, I’m told Paramount’s assets have degraded in value. This isn’t a surprise. The company’s linear TV assets have long been in a state of decline. Executives haven’t been able to move forward with strategic business decisions given the state of the company was in limbo. Some of those executives, including former co-CEOs Chris McCarthy and Brian Robbins, aren’t even with the company anymore. We’ll find out the extent of the depreciation of value when Paramount reports its third-quarter earnings in November. But that won’t really matter if Paramount strikes a deal with WBD. The whole narrative of the company’s future will be different. I asked NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell what he thought of Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison’s ambition to grow the company so quickly after closing the merger. “It’s exciting for us because it’s showing one of our big partners who is attempting to transform itself right before our eyes,” said Goodell in an exclusive interview last week. “I think they’re recognizing the value of content.” Goodell has reason to be thrilled. Last year, Paramount, which owns CBS Sports, looked like a weakling compared to its competitors. Just as the NBA pulled out from its media rights deal with WBD given its diminished scale relative to rivals, one could have imagined Goodell making the same choice with Paramount. But if Paramount bulks up with a WBD combo, that company will have a huge balance sheet and a very wealthy part-owner in Larry Ellison. The biggest wild card is Comcast’s NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC (at least, until January, when CNBC will be spun off as part of Versant). A company like Netflix doesn’t want Paramount to buy Warner Bros. Discovery on the cheap. A company like NBCUniversal doesn’t want Paramount to buy WBD at all because it directly affects its very existence. Pushing Paramount and Warner together would make NBCUniversal and Peacock even more subscale than it already is. That could make NBCUniversal a less desirable home, in the future, for major sports and entertainment talent that want to maximize viewership. Would a sports league want to put programming on Peacock, or a combined Paramount+ and HBO Max? The latter would have far more viewers. Would Comcast CEO Brian Roberts and soon-to-be co-CEO Mike Cavanagh make a competing bid for all of WBD? Does that even make sense while NBCUniversal is spinning off almost all of its cable networks? Is there another partner out there that NBCUniversal could acquire or merge with? Zaslav has begged for big media consolidation for years. We may finally be on the verge of seeing some dramatic action.
2
6
CosmicCartomancy3 days ago
Vibe Check
The Netflix Boycott and Shadow Number 3
The Netflix Boycott and Shadow Number 3 This is a very interesting read, w/ regards to the Netflix boycott. I asked how things will move forward as rhe result if this boycott. As you can see the dominant suit is diamonds, and they're all reversed, which shows the financial loss, due to a breakdown in what ppl are willing to invest in. But this isnt just about Netflix losing subscriptions, it’s also about ppl withdrawing trust in what the platform stands for. *This is actually a new technique I'm testing out* All diamonds = 16 Shadow 16 can be about abruptness, unexpected endings, ghosting,.etc. Which makes sense w/ the sudden mass membership cancellations. 4 ♤ mirroring 10 ♡ both upright and flanking the reversed diamonds. The 10 ♡ shows the emotional storm coming from the public. It’s collective energy at full volume, ppl are reacting w/ intensity, disappointment, and a deep sense of betrayal 4 ♤ All suits are present apart from clubs ♧ which shows Netflix is paralyzed, they dont know ehat to do. It's like the company is going to be emotionally overwhelmed, structurally unstable, and karmically paused, without a leg to stand on, so to speak. Card total = 30, read as shadow 30. This shows the core background energy as conflicting narratives, gossip, and false or misleading information that spreads like wild fire, especially on social media platforms. I wonder if Elon Musk will regret what he's done?
2
0
picadejoso2 days ago
Vibe Check
30 Filmes que vi nas férias
30 Filmes que vi nas férias Foram 30 filmes em 30 dias de férias. Não foi intencional, e nem foi um filme por dia. Porém foquei mesmo na sétima arte, por mais que não fui ao cinema um dia sequer. Fica o texto como 30 sugestões bastante diversificadas, pequenos comentários, e uma breve análise no fim, sobre onde/como assistir filmes atualmente. ^(\[sem spoiler\] \[nenhum site pirata\]) **Barfly** (1987) - YouTube Revi depois de 12 anos, porque reli o Hollywood do Bukowski, que narra a escrita do argumento e a filmagem dessa obra. Mesmo quem nunca leu o velho safado, mas gosta de filme de bar, gente bebendo, gente brigando, etc tem que dar uma chance. Divertido demais. **Galadiador 2** (2024) - Netflix Vi por "obrigação", da até aquela tristeza se comparar com o 1, mas é um espetáculo visual e tanto em umas tantas cenas. Não vou nem elogiar a melhor parte, porque falar que ela existe já é um spoiler. É aquele filme nota 6 que você vai ver uma vez na vida, achar ok, e nunca mais ver outra vez. **Nosferatu** (2024) - Amazon Prime Não pude ver no cinema, e como me arrependo! Filme maravilhoso. gostei muito dessa versão. Confesso que tinha outros interesses mais prementes enquanto o filme se dava, mas desde o começo notei um respeito e admiração pela obra original que falta tanto nos reboots de hoje... esse vou rever ao longo da vida, com certeza. **Premonição 6** (2025) - HBO Max Eu sabia que seria o tipo de filme gostosinho de ver uma vez, fácil de aplicar na pessoa que vem assistir contigo e provavelmente viu todos, e ainda não viu esse. E sinceramente vem aquela sensação de "eu não vim até aqui para desistir agora, já vi até o 5, vamos ver o 6". Achei um bom mais do mesmo! Os "acidentes" são muito criativos, vale a pena. **Capitão América Admirável Mundo Novo** (2025) - Disney + Pura "obrigação" de seguir o universo da Marvel. O roteiro é muito meia boca, mas tem umas cenas de ação muito boas, principalmente as aéreas. **Thunderbolts** (2025) (a.k.a. Novos Vingadores) - Disney + Melhor filme da Marvel desde o Doutor Destino 2. Os dois nomes que jogam para baixo, mas esse vale a pena até para quem não segue filme de herói, e quer só ver um filme bom. História despretensiosa, personagens carismáticos. Florence Pugh muito bem. **Joana d'Arc** (1948) - Plex TV Não tem legenda pt br. Victor Flaming dá duas aulas aqui, uma de cinema, e outra de história. Claro que tem as suas liberdades, muitas liberdades, mas você sente que é uma personagem de mundo real, no mundo real. Eu já tinha visto o de 1999, e não acredito que tinha deixado esse passar. **Os jovens anos de uma rainha** (1954) - YouTube Filme maravilhoso, mostra uma Rainha Vitoria muito diferente do que geralmente temos em mente. Uma menina-mulher que poderia fácil ser princesa da Disney. o filme é romântico em todos os sentidos da palavra. Para quem gosta é um prato cheio e que pode repetir o quanto quiser. **Coração de Cavaleiro** (2001) - (alugado no YouTube por R$3,99) Acho que todo mundo concorda que é maravilhoso. e quem não viu, tem de ver. Eu nunca tinha assistido no idioma original, só na TV mesmo. E o filme conseguiu ficar ainda melhor para mim assim. Um elogio ao anacronismo; leve, romantico, tanto pessoalmente, quanto com parceiros. **Jasão e os Argonautas** (1963) - Internet Archive "Tem mais acabou" na Netflix, "indisponível na sua região" na Amazon Prime, mas ai joguei no Google, e tinha de graça no archivepontoorg. Eu o assiti quando era criança e nunca mais tinha revisto. Po, alem de ser um filme muito bom, é uma aula de cinema para além de uma de historia do cinema. Os efeitos práticos sao inacreditáveis. Stop motion e os caralhos que não tenho nem competência para elogiar. fico com vergonha de não saber escrever o nome do responsável por elas, como voce deveria ficar, se mesmo assim não sabe de quem eu estou falando. Além de ser um filme dinâmico e rápido para a época, mesmo os Enzos e Valentinas conseguem ver de boa. **Gigôlo por acidente** (1999) - Mercado Play Outro filme que até então eu não tinha visto no original. Comedia que eu adorava quando era adolescente, e pro meu gosto continua muito boa. Você que é jovem e se acha "raiz" tem de ver. Eu acho que é o mesmo pique do humor ali de As Branquelas e o Virgem de 40 anos. Esse foi aquela escolha de quando só queria relaxar e rir um pouco. Quando pesquisei onde assistir, fiquei surpreso com a única opção de resposta. **Rashomon** (1955) - YouTube Kurosawa ainda se tornando O Kurosawa. Esse foi uma sugestão que recebi. Era o único em uma lista de filmes importantes que eu nunca tinha visto. O que me chamou mais a atenção é a cor. Não sei se é porque associo preto e branco a filme noir, mas esse filme as cores parecem magia. Outra coisa é que pela época do filme, não deixa de ser o Japão olhando para dentro no pós guerra, e pós bomba (que considero 2 eventos nacionais diferentes, visto que no primeiro eles se repensam por ter estado do lado dos vilões, e o segundo foram tão vitimas que ficam até atordoados). Enfim... **Cleópatra** (1963) - acervo pessoal Não achei a versão de 6 horas, sempre a procuro! É a quarta vez que vejo esse filme e ainda não acredito nele. As quatro horas de duração parecem 4 eps de anime que você viu na sequência. Para mim esse rolê do Júlio Cesar e da Cleópatra é a parte mais interessante da politica na história do nosso planeta, então ajuda bastante no meu gosto. Mas é um clássico surreal. Tão grandioso em todos os sentidos! Figurino, cenários, ambição! E a Elizabeth Taylor está deslumbrante de uma forma que a própria Cleópatra se sentiria orgulhosa. **Trilogia O Senhor dos Anéis**, versão estendida - acervo pessoal A sociedade do anel (2001) As duas torres (2002) O retorno do rei (2003) Aqui nós estamos falando da elite kkkkk 100/10 eterno, ainda mais se a gente se policiar para não comparar com os livros. De três em três anos costumo rever as versões estendidas. Se tem alguém que não viu LOTR me faça um favor né... e faça um favor para si mesmo. A única versão estendida que é imprescindível é a 2. A primeira se você não leu o livro é ok ver a normal, e a 3 não perde tanta coisa. **Nosferatu** (1922) - YouTube Clássico, obrigatório, curto, interessante e tem de graça no YouTube. Uma aula de história do cinema, mesmo se não gostar do filme. Acho que assustar, não assusta mais, se ir com esse pique dá errado. Mas tirando isso é uma experiência e tanto! "ah, a gente viu o novo, vamos ver o clássico também. - claro, vamos sim" **Bonequinha de Luxo** (1961) - acervo pessoal Por 3 anos tive esse filme aqui e calhou de um dia tudo ir na direção de assisti-lo. Audrey Hapburn faz você rever todos os seus valores aqui. Ou deveria kkkkkk meu deus, que filme bom e que atuação charmosa, de uma Hollywood tão mais simpática mesmo quando não queria ser. **É o fim** (2013) - Netflix Minha comédia favorita. Devo ter visto dez vezes. É da turma do James Franco e Seth Rogen, e tem muitas participações especiais. Aquela comédia de maconha engraçada pra quem curte. Cheia de referencia ao próprio trabalho dos caras (então quem gosta de Segurando as Pontas da vida vai curtir). Além de ter uma cena com a Emma Watson que eu choro de rir toda vez. Po, tem uma lição de vida honesta e ainda termina com Backstreet Boys. É absolut cinema 10/10 **Todos os Harry Potter** (2001 até 2011) - HBO Max Harry Potter e a pedra filosofal versão estendida Harry Potter e a Câmara secreta versão estendida Harry Potter e o Prisioneiro de Azkaban Harry Potter e o Cálice de fogo Harry Potter e a Ordem da Fênix Harry Potter e o Enigma do Príncipe Harry Potter e as Relíquias das da morte pt1 Harry Potter e as Relíquias da morte pt2 Não vou ficar comentando Harry Potter. Todo mundo sabe do que se trata. O que acho válido é ressaltar as versões estendidas dos dois primeiros filmes, que muita gente nunca viu. Elas são de 2007 e 2009, mas saíram mesmo em DVD's em 2014. No primeiro filme são vários cortezinhos de 45, 30, até 15 segundos. Muitos você nem percebe, mas aumenta mais de 20 minutos de filme. Já no Camara Secreta tem várias cenas que melhoram o filme muito, e desenvolvem melhor o Harry enquanto figura pública. Impressionante como tem fala de figurante kkkk. É quase meia hora a mais de filme, acredito. A sensação é ainda maior. Infelizmente não tem versões estendidas dos outros, e olha que tem material. No YouTube qualquer um encontra quase 3 horas de cenas cortadas desses filmes. Eu acho que principalmente o 3 pede muito uma versão maior... **13º Guerreiro** (1999) - Disney + Eu fico de cara como 1999 foi o melhor ano do cinema. nunca paro de descobrir filmes bons que saíram nele. O Bandeiras convence muito de Ahmed Ibn Fhadlan aqui, e os vikings do filme passam uma vibe mais real. Ainda mantem as características que esperamos em vikings, mas são menos caricatos, e de forma alguma parecem super heróis. É um bom filme, mas não é uma grande produção. Filme para ver de bobeira assim, não fazer dele um evento. Eu particularmente gosto da parada mística-neandertal que o filme traz, mas para algumas pessoas não passa... **Os Cavaleiros do Zodíaco - Prólogo do Céu** (2004) - Facebook Única animação da lista. Eu terminei de reler os 48 mangás clássicos da Conrad, e tal qual fiz 20 anos atrás, fui ver esse filme. Sei que o projeto foi descontinuado, e que Next Dimensions em mangá é a continuação cânone etc. Foi mais uma parada nostalgia que tem muito valor. Além do filme per si ser uma parada bem diferente de um filme de anime padrão. Os cenários bem bonitos, focado num amor do Seya pela Saori mais do que pela Atena per si. Não achei o filme em lugar nenhum de streaming, qual não foi minha surpresa quando o vi no Facebook, e em um post de antes da pandemia! **The Bling Ring - A gangue de Hollywood** (2013) - Amazon Prime adicionando assinatura do DIAMOND FILMS + que custa R$19,99 \[porém há um período de teste gratuito de 7 dias\] Obrigado Sofia Copolla por dar essa versão da Emma Watson para o mundo kkkk Nunca te critiquei! Sem sacanagem, e com sacanagem, é um filme bem gostoso de ver. Apesar do tema ser crime, é de uma pureza que até encanta, se você tiver nostalgia nesse tipo de mundo. Como eu bato idade com a maioria dos atores (tenho 33 anos), é engraçado olhar para o começo da década de 2010 assim... parece que foi ontem e o mundo já mudou foda. Bem, mesmo quem não gostar do filme, não tem como reclamar da vista. Cabe dizer: 1 - Artista que mais apareceu: Emma Watson, em dez filmes. 2 - Vi todos os filmes no idioma original, mas com exceção do Joanna d'Arc, todos os filmes citados tem legenda em ptbr, mas não posso falar quanto a dublagem (mas se tiver, geralmente é boa). 3 - Não vi nenhum filme dos meus diretores favoritos. E pela primeira vez na minha vida, fiquei uma férias inteira sem ver Star Wars. 4- Dos filmes que eu pensei em ver, só desisti de assistir o Homem da Máscara de Ferro, pois o mais barato que achei no dia foi alugar na Amazon Prime por R$19,99, aí meu dinheiro não é capim. (E não me arrependo, pois foi nesse dia que revi Coração de Cavaleiro.) 5 - Onze desses filmes eu vi pela primeira vez. Então 19 foram revendo (rei da Matemática). Hoje em dia eu tenho quase todos os streamings. O HBO Max vem no meu plano de internet, o Disney + no do celular, a Amazon eu assino por causa do frete grátis, do Futebol, e também me impede de ver propaganda na Twitch. A Netflix eu tenho pago, esse mês não compensou, mas mês passado por exemplo eu revi todo o Stranger Things e vi 2 filmes. Enfim... a questão é que se for ver, mesmo assim, grande parte dos filmes que eu vi nesse recorte foram fora desses meios. O YouTube é excelente para filme antigo, quase nenhum da propaganda e estão todos nas melhores qualidades. E para quem sabe ingles o Internet Archive e o Plex tem clássicos e mais clássicos. Até no Facebook e no Mercado Livre tem filme! **Acho que todos os streamings valem a pena, mas não vale a pena pagar por todos.** Melhor ir revezando trimestralmente dentro do que espera ver, se for o caso. Se estiver sem dinheiro, da para se virar bem sem nenhum por anos, até se estabilizar minimamente. Isso se você já tiver esgotado os testes grátis do seu IP. E outra coisa que eu acho que vale muito, mas muito a pena, é ainda ter mídia física. Principalmente filme que você for ver a vida toda. Do Play Station 2 eterno para ver gravado, até um blue-ray maneiro, o investimento é certeiro. A parada é sua, você não depende de mais ninguém, nem da internet em si. Uma dica final que eu quero deixar: **Parem de ir para o streaming sem saber o que vão assistir. Decidam primeiro, depois vejam se tem ou não. Se não o título, ao menos o estilo ou o diretor.** Deixar para última hora faz você perder um tempo precioso! As vezes meia hora do seu dia. Se juntar todas as vezes que isso acontece da uns 15 filmes por ano. As vezes é a diferença entre 7 e 6 horas de sono. Se alguém chegou até aqui, e mesmo assim não tirou uma indicação de filme, ou reflexão quanto ao streaming, desculpe sz kkkkkkkkk
2
3
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
HERE’S*! WAY TO WATCH UEFA Europa League Game 𝕃𝕚𝕧𝕖 Ｆｒｅｅ Ｓｔｒｅａｍ
HERE’S*! WAY TO WATCH UEFA Europa League Game 𝕃𝕚𝕧𝕖 Ｆｒｅｅ Ｓｔｒｅａｍ Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
Today™️)HERE’S!! (WAY) TO WATCH Europa League Game LIVE Streams ON TV CHANNEL
Today™️)HERE’S!! (WAY) TO WATCH Europa League Game LIVE Streams ON TV CHANNEL Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
CBS™️)How to watch Europa League Game on Tonight for free
CBS™️)How to watch Europa League Game on Tonight for free Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
Hyxenflay7737_45653 days ago
Vibe Check
I had a bot taken down that just had the same name as a Disney character
I had a bot taken down that just had the same name as a Disney character I had a Jungle Book bot up that was from a movie adaption not made by Disney—characters had the same names. It’s a 2018 film on Netflix and had nothing to do with any of the Disney versions. And it got taken down. Really annoyed, honestly. I get the DMCA thing, but it literally wasn’t even a Disney thing.
7
5
esnupiland3 days ago
Vibe Check
Which should I watch first?
Which should I watch first? Hi everyone, here’s a list of my recommended anime’s from reddit, friends, etc. Which should I watch first? Currently watching: Fruits Basket and Frieren. I like all genres! Anime’s I’ve seen: - [ ] attack on titan (11/10) - [ ] demon slayer (10/10) - [ ] yona of the dawn (11/10) - [ ] my happy marriage (9/10) - [ ] the fragrant flower blooms with dignity (8/10) - [ ] ouran high school host club (9/10) - [ ] jujitsu kaisen (started) - [ ] apothecary diaries (9/10) - [ ] black butler (7/10, never finished) - [ ] a sign of affection (8/10) - [ ] avatar the last airbender (11/10 Animes I have yet to watch: - [ ] fruits basket (crunchy roll) - [ ] maid sama (disney+) - [ ] violet evergarden (netflix) - [ ] frieren (netflix) - [ ] more than a married couple but not lovers (crunchy roll) - [ ] kamisama kiss (crunchy roll or disney+) - [ ] a girl and her guard dog (crunchy roll) - [ ] i want to eat your pancreas - [ ] 7th time loop (crunchy roll) - [ ] romantic killer (netflix) - [ ] snow white with the red hair (crunchy roll) - [ ] erased (crunchy roll) - [ ] death note (netflix) - [ ] vinland saga (netflix) - [ ] ice guy and his cool female colleague (crunchy roll) - [ ] honey lemon soda (crunchy roll) - [ ] the gorilla god’s go-to girl (crunchy roll) - [ ] attack on titan jr high (crunchy roll) - [ ] full metal brotherhood (crunchy roll) - [ ] kill la kill - [ ] spy x family (crunchy roll) - [ ] jjk (netflix) - [ ] banana fish (crunchy roll ?) - [ ] 86 (crunchy roll) - [ ] buddy daddies - [ ] rokka no yuusha - [ ] the rising of the shield hero
3
15
Minimum-Guard-57102 days ago
Vibe Check
32 [F4M] British girl looking for something extraordinary 💫
32 [F4M] British girl looking for something extraordinary 💫 🩷 Me: 32, British, brunette, green eyes, plus size, 5ft 7. Friendly, creative, smiley, active, generous, spontaneous, affectionate. Leo. ENFJ. Single mum. Beyoncé fan. Really cool. 🩵 You: Older than me. Attentive, open, fun and energetic. Willing to share photos and selfies right away. (Sorry that you apparently got blackmailed back in 2016 but I can’t bond with a picture of your car/chin/cat) Bonus points for dog dads, real dads, well groomed beards, similar time zones and great accents! 💛 Us: Online but open to IRL if it works! Let’s swap pictures, selfies, videos regularly, and I won’t try to sell you anything! I’ll show you pictures of my pet dog, the dress I’m wearing that day, the wild deer and foxes outside my house, and the food I cook! I’ll video all you at 2am when you’re sad, recommend music I think you’d like, and share my incredible chocolate chip cookie recipe with you. Let’s watch Netflix shows together. Let me doodle inappropriate sketches while I’m in meetings and send them to you. I’ll send you voice messages to wake up to, share pictures of things that make me think of you, and tell you how hot you look when you just wake up all scruffy and sleepy. I’ll let you rant about your annoying colleague, help you pick out a new tie for that interview, flirt a little to keep us smiling, and be the best pocket pal you never knew you needed. To be very honest, I want to fall in love and be adorable best friends that maybe flirt together sometimes 😅 maybe we are soulmates and meet and never look back. Maybe we find a steady friend who can have each others back for years to come. I don’t know! Find out with me!
3
1
jlo1173 days ago
Vibe Check
Cassandra Coleman's new song "Bite My Tongue" is featured in Season 2 of Netflix's Nobody Wants This
Cassandra Coleman's new song "Bite My Tongue" is featured in Season 2 of Netflix's Nobody Wants This [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZReOxA5MA6I](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZReOxA5MA6I)
2
0
jamiestar92 days ago
Vibe Check
CNBC Sport: What to expect as a Paramount bid for WBD looms
CNBC Sport: What to expect as a Paramount bid for WBD looms All deals, big or small, need a willing buyer and a willing seller. Paramount is preparing a bid to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, CNBC reported several weeks ago. The question for Warner Bros. Discovery Chief Executive Officer David Zaslav and his board will be whether to accept Paramount’s bid or to wait and move forward with a planned splitting of the company into two – a linear cable networks-driven entity called Discovery Global and a studio and streaming service firm to be called Warner Bros. If Paramount and WBD agree to a transaction, it would create a media and sports behemoth, bringing together TNT Sports and CBS Sports. March Madness would be united under one corporate roof. While a combined company still wouldn’t have NBA rights, after Warner Bros. Discovery failed to secure them in the league’s most recent TV deal beginning this upcoming season, it would have the NFL, MLB, NHL, some college football, UFC, NASCAR and much more. In other words, it would be a sports giant not quite the size of ESPN, but pretty close to NBCUniversal. A tie-up would be enormous in scale and in dollars. Warner Bros. Discovery is currently trading at around $19 a share, giving the company a market capitalization of $47 billion. Add another $30 billion in net debt and an additional takeover premium, and we’re talking about a transaction that could reach $90 billion. My colleague David Faber reported last month a bid could come in between $22 and $24 a share. I’m sure Zaslav will push for even more. Zaslav’s leverage is that he and the board believe there could be a bidding war for the Warner Bros. assets that will lift the value so high as to make Paramount’s bid for the entire company seem undervalued. Zaslav has told others that companies like Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Comcast could be interested in the studios and streaming business, according to people familiar with the matter, and he might be right. HBO and Warner Bros. studio would fit nicely with any of those companies. Paramount probably wants to avoid a bidding war, which could force the world’s second-wealthiest person and would-be-backer Larry Ellison’s hand into making an aggressive bid for the company before it splits into two. Companies such as Netflix, Apple and Amazon aren’t interested in owning legacy media assets like cable networks. Paramount, on the other hand, would have synergies by clumping its cable networks together with Warner’s for added distribution heft with pay TV providers. A combined company could keep the networks for the cash flow and the sports rights, or it could eventually split them off like Warner Bros. Discovery had planned. There’s another reason Paramount may want to move early, I’m told. The Skydance-Paramount merger ended up taking longer than expected after the FCC dragged its feet on approving a deal until after a “60 Minutes” settlement yielded $16 million to President Donald Trump. During that time, I’m told Paramount’s assets have degraded in value. This isn’t a surprise. The company’s linear TV assets have long been in a state of decline. Executives haven’t been able to move forward with strategic business decisions given the state of the company was in limbo. Some of those executives, including former co-CEOs Chris McCarthy and Brian Robbins, aren’t even with the company anymore. We’ll find out the extent of the depreciation of value when Paramount reports its third-quarter earnings in November. But that won’t really matter if Paramount strikes a deal with WBD. The whole narrative of the company’s future will be different. I asked NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell what he thought of Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison’s ambition to grow the company so quickly after closing the merger. “It’s exciting for us because it’s showing one of our big partners who is attempting to transform itself right before our eyes,” said Goodell in an exclusive interview last week. “I think they’re recognizing the value of content.” Goodell has reason to be thrilled. Last year, Paramount, which owns CBS Sports, looked like a weakling compared to its competitors. Just as the NBA pulled out from its media rights deal with WBD given its diminished scale relative to rivals, one could have imagined Goodell making the same choice with Paramount. But if Paramount bulks up with a WBD combo, that company will have a huge balance sheet and a very wealthy part-owner in Larry Ellison. The biggest wild card is Comcast’s NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC (at least, until January, when CNBC will be spun off as part of Versant). A company like Netflix doesn’t want Paramount to buy Warner Bros. Discovery on the cheap. A company like NBCUniversal doesn’t want Paramount to buy WBD at all because it directly affects its very existence. Pushing Paramount and Warner together would make NBCUniversal and Peacock even more subscale than it already is. That could make NBCUniversal a less desirable home, in the future, for major sports and entertainment talent that want to maximize viewership. Would a sports league want to put programming on Peacock, or a combined Paramount+ and HBO Max? The latter would have far more viewers. Would Comcast CEO Brian Roberts and soon-to-be co-CEO Mike Cavanagh make a competing bid for all of WBD? Does that even make sense while NBCUniversal is spinning off almost all of its cable networks? Is there another partner out there that NBCUniversal could acquire or merge with? Zaslav has begged for big media consolidation for years. We may finally be on the verge of seeing some dramatic action.
2
6
CosmicCartomancy3 days ago
Vibe Check
The Netflix Boycott and Shadow Number 3
The Netflix Boycott and Shadow Number 3 This is a very interesting read, w/ regards to the Netflix boycott. I asked how things will move forward as rhe result if this boycott. As you can see the dominant suit is diamonds, and they're all reversed, which shows the financial loss, due to a breakdown in what ppl are willing to invest in. But this isnt just about Netflix losing subscriptions, it’s also about ppl withdrawing trust in what the platform stands for. *This is actually a new technique I'm testing out* All diamonds = 16 Shadow 16 can be about abruptness, unexpected endings, ghosting,.etc. Which makes sense w/ the sudden mass membership cancellations. 4 ♤ mirroring 10 ♡ both upright and flanking the reversed diamonds. The 10 ♡ shows the emotional storm coming from the public. It’s collective energy at full volume, ppl are reacting w/ intensity, disappointment, and a deep sense of betrayal 4 ♤ All suits are present apart from clubs ♧ which shows Netflix is paralyzed, they dont know ehat to do. It's like the company is going to be emotionally overwhelmed, structurally unstable, and karmically paused, without a leg to stand on, so to speak. Card total = 30, read as shadow 30. This shows the core background energy as conflicting narratives, gossip, and false or misleading information that spreads like wild fire, especially on social media platforms. I wonder if Elon Musk will regret what he's done?
2
0
picadejoso2 days ago
Vibe Check
30 Filmes que vi nas férias
30 Filmes que vi nas férias Foram 30 filmes em 30 dias de férias. Não foi intencional, e nem foi um filme por dia. Porém foquei mesmo na sétima arte, por mais que não fui ao cinema um dia sequer. Fica o texto como 30 sugestões bastante diversificadas, pequenos comentários, e uma breve análise no fim, sobre onde/como assistir filmes atualmente. ^(\[sem spoiler\] \[nenhum site pirata\]) **Barfly** (1987) - YouTube Revi depois de 12 anos, porque reli o Hollywood do Bukowski, que narra a escrita do argumento e a filmagem dessa obra. Mesmo quem nunca leu o velho safado, mas gosta de filme de bar, gente bebendo, gente brigando, etc tem que dar uma chance. Divertido demais. **Galadiador 2** (2024) - Netflix Vi por "obrigação", da até aquela tristeza se comparar com o 1, mas é um espetáculo visual e tanto em umas tantas cenas. Não vou nem elogiar a melhor parte, porque falar que ela existe já é um spoiler. É aquele filme nota 6 que você vai ver uma vez na vida, achar ok, e nunca mais ver outra vez. **Nosferatu** (2024) - Amazon Prime Não pude ver no cinema, e como me arrependo! Filme maravilhoso. gostei muito dessa versão. Confesso que tinha outros interesses mais prementes enquanto o filme se dava, mas desde o começo notei um respeito e admiração pela obra original que falta tanto nos reboots de hoje... esse vou rever ao longo da vida, com certeza. **Premonição 6** (2025) - HBO Max Eu sabia que seria o tipo de filme gostosinho de ver uma vez, fácil de aplicar na pessoa que vem assistir contigo e provavelmente viu todos, e ainda não viu esse. E sinceramente vem aquela sensação de "eu não vim até aqui para desistir agora, já vi até o 5, vamos ver o 6". Achei um bom mais do mesmo! Os "acidentes" são muito criativos, vale a pena. **Capitão América Admirável Mundo Novo** (2025) - Disney + Pura "obrigação" de seguir o universo da Marvel. O roteiro é muito meia boca, mas tem umas cenas de ação muito boas, principalmente as aéreas. **Thunderbolts** (2025) (a.k.a. Novos Vingadores) - Disney + Melhor filme da Marvel desde o Doutor Destino 2. Os dois nomes que jogam para baixo, mas esse vale a pena até para quem não segue filme de herói, e quer só ver um filme bom. História despretensiosa, personagens carismáticos. Florence Pugh muito bem. **Joana d'Arc** (1948) - Plex TV Não tem legenda pt br. Victor Flaming dá duas aulas aqui, uma de cinema, e outra de história. Claro que tem as suas liberdades, muitas liberdades, mas você sente que é uma personagem de mundo real, no mundo real. Eu já tinha visto o de 1999, e não acredito que tinha deixado esse passar. **Os jovens anos de uma rainha** (1954) - YouTube Filme maravilhoso, mostra uma Rainha Vitoria muito diferente do que geralmente temos em mente. Uma menina-mulher que poderia fácil ser princesa da Disney. o filme é romântico em todos os sentidos da palavra. Para quem gosta é um prato cheio e que pode repetir o quanto quiser. **Coração de Cavaleiro** (2001) - (alugado no YouTube por R$3,99) Acho que todo mundo concorda que é maravilhoso. e quem não viu, tem de ver. Eu nunca tinha assistido no idioma original, só na TV mesmo. E o filme conseguiu ficar ainda melhor para mim assim. Um elogio ao anacronismo; leve, romantico, tanto pessoalmente, quanto com parceiros. **Jasão e os Argonautas** (1963) - Internet Archive "Tem mais acabou" na Netflix, "indisponível na sua região" na Amazon Prime, mas ai joguei no Google, e tinha de graça no archivepontoorg. Eu o assiti quando era criança e nunca mais tinha revisto. Po, alem de ser um filme muito bom, é uma aula de cinema para além de uma de historia do cinema. Os efeitos práticos sao inacreditáveis. Stop motion e os caralhos que não tenho nem competência para elogiar. fico com vergonha de não saber escrever o nome do responsável por elas, como voce deveria ficar, se mesmo assim não sabe de quem eu estou falando. Além de ser um filme dinâmico e rápido para a época, mesmo os Enzos e Valentinas conseguem ver de boa. **Gigôlo por acidente** (1999) - Mercado Play Outro filme que até então eu não tinha visto no original. Comedia que eu adorava quando era adolescente, e pro meu gosto continua muito boa. Você que é jovem e se acha "raiz" tem de ver. Eu acho que é o mesmo pique do humor ali de As Branquelas e o Virgem de 40 anos. Esse foi aquela escolha de quando só queria relaxar e rir um pouco. Quando pesquisei onde assistir, fiquei surpreso com a única opção de resposta. **Rashomon** (1955) - YouTube Kurosawa ainda se tornando O Kurosawa. Esse foi uma sugestão que recebi. Era o único em uma lista de filmes importantes que eu nunca tinha visto. O que me chamou mais a atenção é a cor. Não sei se é porque associo preto e branco a filme noir, mas esse filme as cores parecem magia. Outra coisa é que pela época do filme, não deixa de ser o Japão olhando para dentro no pós guerra, e pós bomba (que considero 2 eventos nacionais diferentes, visto que no primeiro eles se repensam por ter estado do lado dos vilões, e o segundo foram tão vitimas que ficam até atordoados). Enfim... **Cleópatra** (1963) - acervo pessoal Não achei a versão de 6 horas, sempre a procuro! É a quarta vez que vejo esse filme e ainda não acredito nele. As quatro horas de duração parecem 4 eps de anime que você viu na sequência. Para mim esse rolê do Júlio Cesar e da Cleópatra é a parte mais interessante da politica na história do nosso planeta, então ajuda bastante no meu gosto. Mas é um clássico surreal. Tão grandioso em todos os sentidos! Figurino, cenários, ambição! E a Elizabeth Taylor está deslumbrante de uma forma que a própria Cleópatra se sentiria orgulhosa. **Trilogia O Senhor dos Anéis**, versão estendida - acervo pessoal A sociedade do anel (2001) As duas torres (2002) O retorno do rei (2003) Aqui nós estamos falando da elite kkkkk 100/10 eterno, ainda mais se a gente se policiar para não comparar com os livros. De três em três anos costumo rever as versões estendidas. Se tem alguém que não viu LOTR me faça um favor né... e faça um favor para si mesmo. A única versão estendida que é imprescindível é a 2. A primeira se você não leu o livro é ok ver a normal, e a 3 não perde tanta coisa. **Nosferatu** (1922) - YouTube Clássico, obrigatório, curto, interessante e tem de graça no YouTube. Uma aula de história do cinema, mesmo se não gostar do filme. Acho que assustar, não assusta mais, se ir com esse pique dá errado. Mas tirando isso é uma experiência e tanto! "ah, a gente viu o novo, vamos ver o clássico também. - claro, vamos sim" **Bonequinha de Luxo** (1961) - acervo pessoal Por 3 anos tive esse filme aqui e calhou de um dia tudo ir na direção de assisti-lo. Audrey Hapburn faz você rever todos os seus valores aqui. Ou deveria kkkkkk meu deus, que filme bom e que atuação charmosa, de uma Hollywood tão mais simpática mesmo quando não queria ser. **É o fim** (2013) - Netflix Minha comédia favorita. Devo ter visto dez vezes. É da turma do James Franco e Seth Rogen, e tem muitas participações especiais. Aquela comédia de maconha engraçada pra quem curte. Cheia de referencia ao próprio trabalho dos caras (então quem gosta de Segurando as Pontas da vida vai curtir). Além de ter uma cena com a Emma Watson que eu choro de rir toda vez. Po, tem uma lição de vida honesta e ainda termina com Backstreet Boys. É absolut cinema 10/10 **Todos os Harry Potter** (2001 até 2011) - HBO Max Harry Potter e a pedra filosofal versão estendida Harry Potter e a Câmara secreta versão estendida Harry Potter e o Prisioneiro de Azkaban Harry Potter e o Cálice de fogo Harry Potter e a Ordem da Fênix Harry Potter e o Enigma do Príncipe Harry Potter e as Relíquias das da morte pt1 Harry Potter e as Relíquias da morte pt2 Não vou ficar comentando Harry Potter. Todo mundo sabe do que se trata. O que acho válido é ressaltar as versões estendidas dos dois primeiros filmes, que muita gente nunca viu. Elas são de 2007 e 2009, mas saíram mesmo em DVD's em 2014. No primeiro filme são vários cortezinhos de 45, 30, até 15 segundos. Muitos você nem percebe, mas aumenta mais de 20 minutos de filme. Já no Camara Secreta tem várias cenas que melhoram o filme muito, e desenvolvem melhor o Harry enquanto figura pública. Impressionante como tem fala de figurante kkkk. É quase meia hora a mais de filme, acredito. A sensação é ainda maior. Infelizmente não tem versões estendidas dos outros, e olha que tem material. No YouTube qualquer um encontra quase 3 horas de cenas cortadas desses filmes. Eu acho que principalmente o 3 pede muito uma versão maior... **13º Guerreiro** (1999) - Disney + Eu fico de cara como 1999 foi o melhor ano do cinema. nunca paro de descobrir filmes bons que saíram nele. O Bandeiras convence muito de Ahmed Ibn Fhadlan aqui, e os vikings do filme passam uma vibe mais real. Ainda mantem as características que esperamos em vikings, mas são menos caricatos, e de forma alguma parecem super heróis. É um bom filme, mas não é uma grande produção. Filme para ver de bobeira assim, não fazer dele um evento. Eu particularmente gosto da parada mística-neandertal que o filme traz, mas para algumas pessoas não passa... **Os Cavaleiros do Zodíaco - Prólogo do Céu** (2004) - Facebook Única animação da lista. Eu terminei de reler os 48 mangás clássicos da Conrad, e tal qual fiz 20 anos atrás, fui ver esse filme. Sei que o projeto foi descontinuado, e que Next Dimensions em mangá é a continuação cânone etc. Foi mais uma parada nostalgia que tem muito valor. Além do filme per si ser uma parada bem diferente de um filme de anime padrão. Os cenários bem bonitos, focado num amor do Seya pela Saori mais do que pela Atena per si. Não achei o filme em lugar nenhum de streaming, qual não foi minha surpresa quando o vi no Facebook, e em um post de antes da pandemia! **The Bling Ring - A gangue de Hollywood** (2013) - Amazon Prime adicionando assinatura do DIAMOND FILMS + que custa R$19,99 \[porém há um período de teste gratuito de 7 dias\] Obrigado Sofia Copolla por dar essa versão da Emma Watson para o mundo kkkk Nunca te critiquei! Sem sacanagem, e com sacanagem, é um filme bem gostoso de ver. Apesar do tema ser crime, é de uma pureza que até encanta, se você tiver nostalgia nesse tipo de mundo. Como eu bato idade com a maioria dos atores (tenho 33 anos), é engraçado olhar para o começo da década de 2010 assim... parece que foi ontem e o mundo já mudou foda. Bem, mesmo quem não gostar do filme, não tem como reclamar da vista. Cabe dizer: 1 - Artista que mais apareceu: Emma Watson, em dez filmes. 2 - Vi todos os filmes no idioma original, mas com exceção do Joanna d'Arc, todos os filmes citados tem legenda em ptbr, mas não posso falar quanto a dublagem (mas se tiver, geralmente é boa). 3 - Não vi nenhum filme dos meus diretores favoritos. E pela primeira vez na minha vida, fiquei uma férias inteira sem ver Star Wars. 4- Dos filmes que eu pensei em ver, só desisti de assistir o Homem da Máscara de Ferro, pois o mais barato que achei no dia foi alugar na Amazon Prime por R$19,99, aí meu dinheiro não é capim. (E não me arrependo, pois foi nesse dia que revi Coração de Cavaleiro.) 5 - Onze desses filmes eu vi pela primeira vez. Então 19 foram revendo (rei da Matemática). Hoje em dia eu tenho quase todos os streamings. O HBO Max vem no meu plano de internet, o Disney + no do celular, a Amazon eu assino por causa do frete grátis, do Futebol, e também me impede de ver propaganda na Twitch. A Netflix eu tenho pago, esse mês não compensou, mas mês passado por exemplo eu revi todo o Stranger Things e vi 2 filmes. Enfim... a questão é que se for ver, mesmo assim, grande parte dos filmes que eu vi nesse recorte foram fora desses meios. O YouTube é excelente para filme antigo, quase nenhum da propaganda e estão todos nas melhores qualidades. E para quem sabe ingles o Internet Archive e o Plex tem clássicos e mais clássicos. Até no Facebook e no Mercado Livre tem filme! **Acho que todos os streamings valem a pena, mas não vale a pena pagar por todos.** Melhor ir revezando trimestralmente dentro do que espera ver, se for o caso. Se estiver sem dinheiro, da para se virar bem sem nenhum por anos, até se estabilizar minimamente. Isso se você já tiver esgotado os testes grátis do seu IP. E outra coisa que eu acho que vale muito, mas muito a pena, é ainda ter mídia física. Principalmente filme que você for ver a vida toda. Do Play Station 2 eterno para ver gravado, até um blue-ray maneiro, o investimento é certeiro. A parada é sua, você não depende de mais ninguém, nem da internet em si. Uma dica final que eu quero deixar: **Parem de ir para o streaming sem saber o que vão assistir. Decidam primeiro, depois vejam se tem ou não. Se não o título, ao menos o estilo ou o diretor.** Deixar para última hora faz você perder um tempo precioso! As vezes meia hora do seu dia. Se juntar todas as vezes que isso acontece da uns 15 filmes por ano. As vezes é a diferença entre 7 e 6 horas de sono. Se alguém chegou até aqui, e mesmo assim não tirou uma indicação de filme, ou reflexão quanto ao streaming, desculpe sz kkkkkkkkk
2
3
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
HERE’S*! WAY TO WATCH UEFA Europa League Game 𝕃𝕚𝕧𝕖 Ｆｒｅｅ Ｓｔｒｅａｍ
HERE’S*! WAY TO WATCH UEFA Europa League Game 𝕃𝕚𝕧𝕖 Ｆｒｅｅ Ｓｔｒｅａｍ Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
Today™️)HERE’S!! (WAY) TO WATCH Europa League Game LIVE Streams ON TV CHANNEL
Today™️)HERE’S!! (WAY) TO WATCH Europa League Game LIVE Streams ON TV CHANNEL Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
CBS™️)How to watch Europa League Game on Tonight for free
CBS™️)How to watch Europa League Game on Tonight for free Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
Hyxenflay7737_45653 days ago
Vibe Check
I had a bot taken down that just had the same name as a Disney character
I had a bot taken down that just had the same name as a Disney character I had a Jungle Book bot up that was from a movie adaption not made by Disney—characters had the same names. It’s a 2018 film on Netflix and had nothing to do with any of the Disney versions. And it got taken down. Really annoyed, honestly. I get the DMCA thing, but it literally wasn’t even a Disney thing.
7
5
esnupiland3 days ago
Vibe Check
Which should I watch first?
Which should I watch first? Hi everyone, here’s a list of my recommended anime’s from reddit, friends, etc. Which should I watch first? Currently watching: Fruits Basket and Frieren. I like all genres! Anime’s I’ve seen: - [ ] attack on titan (11/10) - [ ] demon slayer (10/10) - [ ] yona of the dawn (11/10) - [ ] my happy marriage (9/10) - [ ] the fragrant flower blooms with dignity (8/10) - [ ] ouran high school host club (9/10) - [ ] jujitsu kaisen (started) - [ ] apothecary diaries (9/10) - [ ] black butler (7/10, never finished) - [ ] a sign of affection (8/10) - [ ] avatar the last airbender (11/10 Animes I have yet to watch: - [ ] fruits basket (crunchy roll) - [ ] maid sama (disney+) - [ ] violet evergarden (netflix) - [ ] frieren (netflix) - [ ] more than a married couple but not lovers (crunchy roll) - [ ] kamisama kiss (crunchy roll or disney+) - [ ] a girl and her guard dog (crunchy roll) - [ ] i want to eat your pancreas - [ ] 7th time loop (crunchy roll) - [ ] romantic killer (netflix) - [ ] snow white with the red hair (crunchy roll) - [ ] erased (crunchy roll) - [ ] death note (netflix) - [ ] vinland saga (netflix) - [ ] ice guy and his cool female colleague (crunchy roll) - [ ] honey lemon soda (crunchy roll) - [ ] the gorilla god’s go-to girl (crunchy roll) - [ ] attack on titan jr high (crunchy roll) - [ ] full metal brotherhood (crunchy roll) - [ ] kill la kill - [ ] spy x family (crunchy roll) - [ ] jjk (netflix) - [ ] banana fish (crunchy roll ?) - [ ] 86 (crunchy roll) - [ ] buddy daddies - [ ] rokka no yuusha - [ ] the rising of the shield hero
3
15
Minimum-Guard-57102 days ago
Vibe Check
32 [F4M] British girl looking for something extraordinary 💫
32 [F4M] British girl looking for something extraordinary 💫 🩷 Me: 32, British, brunette, green eyes, plus size, 5ft 7. Friendly, creative, smiley, active, generous, spontaneous, affectionate. Leo. ENFJ. Single mum. Beyoncé fan. Really cool. 🩵 You: Older than me. Attentive, open, fun and energetic. Willing to share photos and selfies right away. (Sorry that you apparently got blackmailed back in 2016 but I can’t bond with a picture of your car/chin/cat) Bonus points for dog dads, real dads, well groomed beards, similar time zones and great accents! 💛 Us: Online but open to IRL if it works! Let’s swap pictures, selfies, videos regularly, and I won’t try to sell you anything! I’ll show you pictures of my pet dog, the dress I’m wearing that day, the wild deer and foxes outside my house, and the food I cook! I’ll video all you at 2am when you’re sad, recommend music I think you’d like, and share my incredible chocolate chip cookie recipe with you. Let’s watch Netflix shows together. Let me doodle inappropriate sketches while I’m in meetings and send them to you. I’ll send you voice messages to wake up to, share pictures of things that make me think of you, and tell you how hot you look when you just wake up all scruffy and sleepy. I’ll let you rant about your annoying colleague, help you pick out a new tie for that interview, flirt a little to keep us smiling, and be the best pocket pal you never knew you needed. To be very honest, I want to fall in love and be adorable best friends that maybe flirt together sometimes 😅 maybe we are soulmates and meet and never look back. Maybe we find a steady friend who can have each others back for years to come. I don’t know! Find out with me!
3
1
jlo1173 days ago
Vibe Check
Cassandra Coleman's new song "Bite My Tongue" is featured in Season 2 of Netflix's Nobody Wants This
Cassandra Coleman's new song "Bite My Tongue" is featured in Season 2 of Netflix's Nobody Wants This [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZReOxA5MA6I](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZReOxA5MA6I)
2
0
jamiestar92 days ago
Vibe Check
CNBC Sport: What to expect as a Paramount bid for WBD looms
CNBC Sport: What to expect as a Paramount bid for WBD looms All deals, big or small, need a willing buyer and a willing seller. Paramount is preparing a bid to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, CNBC reported several weeks ago. The question for Warner Bros. Discovery Chief Executive Officer David Zaslav and his board will be whether to accept Paramount’s bid or to wait and move forward with a planned splitting of the company into two – a linear cable networks-driven entity called Discovery Global and a studio and streaming service firm to be called Warner Bros. If Paramount and WBD agree to a transaction, it would create a media and sports behemoth, bringing together TNT Sports and CBS Sports. March Madness would be united under one corporate roof. While a combined company still wouldn’t have NBA rights, after Warner Bros. Discovery failed to secure them in the league’s most recent TV deal beginning this upcoming season, it would have the NFL, MLB, NHL, some college football, UFC, NASCAR and much more. In other words, it would be a sports giant not quite the size of ESPN, but pretty close to NBCUniversal. A tie-up would be enormous in scale and in dollars. Warner Bros. Discovery is currently trading at around $19 a share, giving the company a market capitalization of $47 billion. Add another $30 billion in net debt and an additional takeover premium, and we’re talking about a transaction that could reach $90 billion. My colleague David Faber reported last month a bid could come in between $22 and $24 a share. I’m sure Zaslav will push for even more. Zaslav’s leverage is that he and the board believe there could be a bidding war for the Warner Bros. assets that will lift the value so high as to make Paramount’s bid for the entire company seem undervalued. Zaslav has told others that companies like Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Comcast could be interested in the studios and streaming business, according to people familiar with the matter, and he might be right. HBO and Warner Bros. studio would fit nicely with any of those companies. Paramount probably wants to avoid a bidding war, which could force the world’s second-wealthiest person and would-be-backer Larry Ellison’s hand into making an aggressive bid for the company before it splits into two. Companies such as Netflix, Apple and Amazon aren’t interested in owning legacy media assets like cable networks. Paramount, on the other hand, would have synergies by clumping its cable networks together with Warner’s for added distribution heft with pay TV providers. A combined company could keep the networks for the cash flow and the sports rights, or it could eventually split them off like Warner Bros. Discovery had planned. There’s another reason Paramount may want to move early, I’m told. The Skydance-Paramount merger ended up taking longer than expected after the FCC dragged its feet on approving a deal until after a “60 Minutes” settlement yielded $16 million to President Donald Trump. During that time, I’m told Paramount’s assets have degraded in value. This isn’t a surprise. The company’s linear TV assets have long been in a state of decline. Executives haven’t been able to move forward with strategic business decisions given the state of the company was in limbo. Some of those executives, including former co-CEOs Chris McCarthy and Brian Robbins, aren’t even with the company anymore. We’ll find out the extent of the depreciation of value when Paramount reports its third-quarter earnings in November. But that won’t really matter if Paramount strikes a deal with WBD. The whole narrative of the company’s future will be different. I asked NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell what he thought of Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison’s ambition to grow the company so quickly after closing the merger. “It’s exciting for us because it’s showing one of our big partners who is attempting to transform itself right before our eyes,” said Goodell in an exclusive interview last week. “I think they’re recognizing the value of content.” Goodell has reason to be thrilled. Last year, Paramount, which owns CBS Sports, looked like a weakling compared to its competitors. Just as the NBA pulled out from its media rights deal with WBD given its diminished scale relative to rivals, one could have imagined Goodell making the same choice with Paramount. But if Paramount bulks up with a WBD combo, that company will have a huge balance sheet and a very wealthy part-owner in Larry Ellison. The biggest wild card is Comcast’s NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC (at least, until January, when CNBC will be spun off as part of Versant). A company like Netflix doesn’t want Paramount to buy Warner Bros. Discovery on the cheap. A company like NBCUniversal doesn’t want Paramount to buy WBD at all because it directly affects its very existence. Pushing Paramount and Warner together would make NBCUniversal and Peacock even more subscale than it already is. That could make NBCUniversal a less desirable home, in the future, for major sports and entertainment talent that want to maximize viewership. Would a sports league want to put programming on Peacock, or a combined Paramount+ and HBO Max? The latter would have far more viewers. Would Comcast CEO Brian Roberts and soon-to-be co-CEO Mike Cavanagh make a competing bid for all of WBD? Does that even make sense while NBCUniversal is spinning off almost all of its cable networks? Is there another partner out there that NBCUniversal could acquire or merge with? Zaslav has begged for big media consolidation for years. We may finally be on the verge of seeing some dramatic action.
2
6
CosmicCartomancy3 days ago
Vibe Check
The Netflix Boycott and Shadow Number 3
The Netflix Boycott and Shadow Number 3 This is a very interesting read, w/ regards to the Netflix boycott. I asked how things will move forward as rhe result if this boycott. As you can see the dominant suit is diamonds, and they're all reversed, which shows the financial loss, due to a breakdown in what ppl are willing to invest in. But this isnt just about Netflix losing subscriptions, it’s also about ppl withdrawing trust in what the platform stands for. *This is actually a new technique I'm testing out* All diamonds = 16 Shadow 16 can be about abruptness, unexpected endings, ghosting,.etc. Which makes sense w/ the sudden mass membership cancellations. 4 ♤ mirroring 10 ♡ both upright and flanking the reversed diamonds. The 10 ♡ shows the emotional storm coming from the public. It’s collective energy at full volume, ppl are reacting w/ intensity, disappointment, and a deep sense of betrayal 4 ♤ All suits are present apart from clubs ♧ which shows Netflix is paralyzed, they dont know ehat to do. It's like the company is going to be emotionally overwhelmed, structurally unstable, and karmically paused, without a leg to stand on, so to speak. Card total = 30, read as shadow 30. This shows the core background energy as conflicting narratives, gossip, and false or misleading information that spreads like wild fire, especially on social media platforms. I wonder if Elon Musk will regret what he's done?
2
0
picadejoso2 days ago
Vibe Check
30 Filmes que vi nas férias
30 Filmes que vi nas férias Foram 30 filmes em 30 dias de férias. Não foi intencional, e nem foi um filme por dia. Porém foquei mesmo na sétima arte, por mais que não fui ao cinema um dia sequer. Fica o texto como 30 sugestões bastante diversificadas, pequenos comentários, e uma breve análise no fim, sobre onde/como assistir filmes atualmente. ^(\[sem spoiler\] \[nenhum site pirata\]) **Barfly** (1987) - YouTube Revi depois de 12 anos, porque reli o Hollywood do Bukowski, que narra a escrita do argumento e a filmagem dessa obra. Mesmo quem nunca leu o velho safado, mas gosta de filme de bar, gente bebendo, gente brigando, etc tem que dar uma chance. Divertido demais. **Galadiador 2** (2024) - Netflix Vi por "obrigação", da até aquela tristeza se comparar com o 1, mas é um espetáculo visual e tanto em umas tantas cenas. Não vou nem elogiar a melhor parte, porque falar que ela existe já é um spoiler. É aquele filme nota 6 que você vai ver uma vez na vida, achar ok, e nunca mais ver outra vez. **Nosferatu** (2024) - Amazon Prime Não pude ver no cinema, e como me arrependo! Filme maravilhoso. gostei muito dessa versão. Confesso que tinha outros interesses mais prementes enquanto o filme se dava, mas desde o começo notei um respeito e admiração pela obra original que falta tanto nos reboots de hoje... esse vou rever ao longo da vida, com certeza. **Premonição 6** (2025) - HBO Max Eu sabia que seria o tipo de filme gostosinho de ver uma vez, fácil de aplicar na pessoa que vem assistir contigo e provavelmente viu todos, e ainda não viu esse. E sinceramente vem aquela sensação de "eu não vim até aqui para desistir agora, já vi até o 5, vamos ver o 6". Achei um bom mais do mesmo! Os "acidentes" são muito criativos, vale a pena. **Capitão América Admirável Mundo Novo** (2025) - Disney + Pura "obrigação" de seguir o universo da Marvel. O roteiro é muito meia boca, mas tem umas cenas de ação muito boas, principalmente as aéreas. **Thunderbolts** (2025) (a.k.a. Novos Vingadores) - Disney + Melhor filme da Marvel desde o Doutor Destino 2. Os dois nomes que jogam para baixo, mas esse vale a pena até para quem não segue filme de herói, e quer só ver um filme bom. História despretensiosa, personagens carismáticos. Florence Pugh muito bem. **Joana d'Arc** (1948) - Plex TV Não tem legenda pt br. Victor Flaming dá duas aulas aqui, uma de cinema, e outra de história. Claro que tem as suas liberdades, muitas liberdades, mas você sente que é uma personagem de mundo real, no mundo real. Eu já tinha visto o de 1999, e não acredito que tinha deixado esse passar. **Os jovens anos de uma rainha** (1954) - YouTube Filme maravilhoso, mostra uma Rainha Vitoria muito diferente do que geralmente temos em mente. Uma menina-mulher que poderia fácil ser princesa da Disney. o filme é romântico em todos os sentidos da palavra. Para quem gosta é um prato cheio e que pode repetir o quanto quiser. **Coração de Cavaleiro** (2001) - (alugado no YouTube por R$3,99) Acho que todo mundo concorda que é maravilhoso. e quem não viu, tem de ver. Eu nunca tinha assistido no idioma original, só na TV mesmo. E o filme conseguiu ficar ainda melhor para mim assim. Um elogio ao anacronismo; leve, romantico, tanto pessoalmente, quanto com parceiros. **Jasão e os Argonautas** (1963) - Internet Archive "Tem mais acabou" na Netflix, "indisponível na sua região" na Amazon Prime, mas ai joguei no Google, e tinha de graça no archivepontoorg. Eu o assiti quando era criança e nunca mais tinha revisto. Po, alem de ser um filme muito bom, é uma aula de cinema para além de uma de historia do cinema. Os efeitos práticos sao inacreditáveis. Stop motion e os caralhos que não tenho nem competência para elogiar. fico com vergonha de não saber escrever o nome do responsável por elas, como voce deveria ficar, se mesmo assim não sabe de quem eu estou falando. Além de ser um filme dinâmico e rápido para a época, mesmo os Enzos e Valentinas conseguem ver de boa. **Gigôlo por acidente** (1999) - Mercado Play Outro filme que até então eu não tinha visto no original. Comedia que eu adorava quando era adolescente, e pro meu gosto continua muito boa. Você que é jovem e se acha "raiz" tem de ver. Eu acho que é o mesmo pique do humor ali de As Branquelas e o Virgem de 40 anos. Esse foi aquela escolha de quando só queria relaxar e rir um pouco. Quando pesquisei onde assistir, fiquei surpreso com a única opção de resposta. **Rashomon** (1955) - YouTube Kurosawa ainda se tornando O Kurosawa. Esse foi uma sugestão que recebi. Era o único em uma lista de filmes importantes que eu nunca tinha visto. O que me chamou mais a atenção é a cor. Não sei se é porque associo preto e branco a filme noir, mas esse filme as cores parecem magia. Outra coisa é que pela época do filme, não deixa de ser o Japão olhando para dentro no pós guerra, e pós bomba (que considero 2 eventos nacionais diferentes, visto que no primeiro eles se repensam por ter estado do lado dos vilões, e o segundo foram tão vitimas que ficam até atordoados). Enfim... **Cleópatra** (1963) - acervo pessoal Não achei a versão de 6 horas, sempre a procuro! É a quarta vez que vejo esse filme e ainda não acredito nele. As quatro horas de duração parecem 4 eps de anime que você viu na sequência. Para mim esse rolê do Júlio Cesar e da Cleópatra é a parte mais interessante da politica na história do nosso planeta, então ajuda bastante no meu gosto. Mas é um clássico surreal. Tão grandioso em todos os sentidos! Figurino, cenários, ambição! E a Elizabeth Taylor está deslumbrante de uma forma que a própria Cleópatra se sentiria orgulhosa. **Trilogia O Senhor dos Anéis**, versão estendida - acervo pessoal A sociedade do anel (2001) As duas torres (2002) O retorno do rei (2003) Aqui nós estamos falando da elite kkkkk 100/10 eterno, ainda mais se a gente se policiar para não comparar com os livros. De três em três anos costumo rever as versões estendidas. Se tem alguém que não viu LOTR me faça um favor né... e faça um favor para si mesmo. A única versão estendida que é imprescindível é a 2. A primeira se você não leu o livro é ok ver a normal, e a 3 não perde tanta coisa. **Nosferatu** (1922) - YouTube Clássico, obrigatório, curto, interessante e tem de graça no YouTube. Uma aula de história do cinema, mesmo se não gostar do filme. Acho que assustar, não assusta mais, se ir com esse pique dá errado. Mas tirando isso é uma experiência e tanto! "ah, a gente viu o novo, vamos ver o clássico também. - claro, vamos sim" **Bonequinha de Luxo** (1961) - acervo pessoal Por 3 anos tive esse filme aqui e calhou de um dia tudo ir na direção de assisti-lo. Audrey Hapburn faz você rever todos os seus valores aqui. Ou deveria kkkkkk meu deus, que filme bom e que atuação charmosa, de uma Hollywood tão mais simpática mesmo quando não queria ser. **É o fim** (2013) - Netflix Minha comédia favorita. Devo ter visto dez vezes. É da turma do James Franco e Seth Rogen, e tem muitas participações especiais. Aquela comédia de maconha engraçada pra quem curte. Cheia de referencia ao próprio trabalho dos caras (então quem gosta de Segurando as Pontas da vida vai curtir). Além de ter uma cena com a Emma Watson que eu choro de rir toda vez. Po, tem uma lição de vida honesta e ainda termina com Backstreet Boys. É absolut cinema 10/10 **Todos os Harry Potter** (2001 até 2011) - HBO Max Harry Potter e a pedra filosofal versão estendida Harry Potter e a Câmara secreta versão estendida Harry Potter e o Prisioneiro de Azkaban Harry Potter e o Cálice de fogo Harry Potter e a Ordem da Fênix Harry Potter e o Enigma do Príncipe Harry Potter e as Relíquias das da morte pt1 Harry Potter e as Relíquias da morte pt2 Não vou ficar comentando Harry Potter. Todo mundo sabe do que se trata. O que acho válido é ressaltar as versões estendidas dos dois primeiros filmes, que muita gente nunca viu. Elas são de 2007 e 2009, mas saíram mesmo em DVD's em 2014. No primeiro filme são vários cortezinhos de 45, 30, até 15 segundos. Muitos você nem percebe, mas aumenta mais de 20 minutos de filme. Já no Camara Secreta tem várias cenas que melhoram o filme muito, e desenvolvem melhor o Harry enquanto figura pública. Impressionante como tem fala de figurante kkkk. É quase meia hora a mais de filme, acredito. A sensação é ainda maior. Infelizmente não tem versões estendidas dos outros, e olha que tem material. No YouTube qualquer um encontra quase 3 horas de cenas cortadas desses filmes. Eu acho que principalmente o 3 pede muito uma versão maior... **13º Guerreiro** (1999) - Disney + Eu fico de cara como 1999 foi o melhor ano do cinema. nunca paro de descobrir filmes bons que saíram nele. O Bandeiras convence muito de Ahmed Ibn Fhadlan aqui, e os vikings do filme passam uma vibe mais real. Ainda mantem as características que esperamos em vikings, mas são menos caricatos, e de forma alguma parecem super heróis. É um bom filme, mas não é uma grande produção. Filme para ver de bobeira assim, não fazer dele um evento. Eu particularmente gosto da parada mística-neandertal que o filme traz, mas para algumas pessoas não passa... **Os Cavaleiros do Zodíaco - Prólogo do Céu** (2004) - Facebook Única animação da lista. Eu terminei de reler os 48 mangás clássicos da Conrad, e tal qual fiz 20 anos atrás, fui ver esse filme. Sei que o projeto foi descontinuado, e que Next Dimensions em mangá é a continuação cânone etc. Foi mais uma parada nostalgia que tem muito valor. Além do filme per si ser uma parada bem diferente de um filme de anime padrão. Os cenários bem bonitos, focado num amor do Seya pela Saori mais do que pela Atena per si. Não achei o filme em lugar nenhum de streaming, qual não foi minha surpresa quando o vi no Facebook, e em um post de antes da pandemia! **The Bling Ring - A gangue de Hollywood** (2013) - Amazon Prime adicionando assinatura do DIAMOND FILMS + que custa R$19,99 \[porém há um período de teste gratuito de 7 dias\] Obrigado Sofia Copolla por dar essa versão da Emma Watson para o mundo kkkk Nunca te critiquei! Sem sacanagem, e com sacanagem, é um filme bem gostoso de ver. Apesar do tema ser crime, é de uma pureza que até encanta, se você tiver nostalgia nesse tipo de mundo. Como eu bato idade com a maioria dos atores (tenho 33 anos), é engraçado olhar para o começo da década de 2010 assim... parece que foi ontem e o mundo já mudou foda. Bem, mesmo quem não gostar do filme, não tem como reclamar da vista. Cabe dizer: 1 - Artista que mais apareceu: Emma Watson, em dez filmes. 2 - Vi todos os filmes no idioma original, mas com exceção do Joanna d'Arc, todos os filmes citados tem legenda em ptbr, mas não posso falar quanto a dublagem (mas se tiver, geralmente é boa). 3 - Não vi nenhum filme dos meus diretores favoritos. E pela primeira vez na minha vida, fiquei uma férias inteira sem ver Star Wars. 4- Dos filmes que eu pensei em ver, só desisti de assistir o Homem da Máscara de Ferro, pois o mais barato que achei no dia foi alugar na Amazon Prime por R$19,99, aí meu dinheiro não é capim. (E não me arrependo, pois foi nesse dia que revi Coração de Cavaleiro.) 5 - Onze desses filmes eu vi pela primeira vez. Então 19 foram revendo (rei da Matemática). Hoje em dia eu tenho quase todos os streamings. O HBO Max vem no meu plano de internet, o Disney + no do celular, a Amazon eu assino por causa do frete grátis, do Futebol, e também me impede de ver propaganda na Twitch. A Netflix eu tenho pago, esse mês não compensou, mas mês passado por exemplo eu revi todo o Stranger Things e vi 2 filmes. Enfim... a questão é que se for ver, mesmo assim, grande parte dos filmes que eu vi nesse recorte foram fora desses meios. O YouTube é excelente para filme antigo, quase nenhum da propaganda e estão todos nas melhores qualidades. E para quem sabe ingles o Internet Archive e o Plex tem clássicos e mais clássicos. Até no Facebook e no Mercado Livre tem filme! **Acho que todos os streamings valem a pena, mas não vale a pena pagar por todos.** Melhor ir revezando trimestralmente dentro do que espera ver, se for o caso. Se estiver sem dinheiro, da para se virar bem sem nenhum por anos, até se estabilizar minimamente. Isso se você já tiver esgotado os testes grátis do seu IP. E outra coisa que eu acho que vale muito, mas muito a pena, é ainda ter mídia física. Principalmente filme que você for ver a vida toda. Do Play Station 2 eterno para ver gravado, até um blue-ray maneiro, o investimento é certeiro. A parada é sua, você não depende de mais ninguém, nem da internet em si. Uma dica final que eu quero deixar: **Parem de ir para o streaming sem saber o que vão assistir. Decidam primeiro, depois vejam se tem ou não. Se não o título, ao menos o estilo ou o diretor.** Deixar para última hora faz você perder um tempo precioso! As vezes meia hora do seu dia. Se juntar todas as vezes que isso acontece da uns 15 filmes por ano. As vezes é a diferença entre 7 e 6 horas de sono. Se alguém chegou até aqui, e mesmo assim não tirou uma indicação de filme, ou reflexão quanto ao streaming, desculpe sz kkkkkkkkk
2
3
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
HERE’S*! WAY TO WATCH UEFA Europa League Game 𝕃𝕚𝕧𝕖 Ｆｒｅｅ Ｓｔｒｅａｍ
HERE’S*! WAY TO WATCH UEFA Europa League Game 𝕃𝕚𝕧𝕖 Ｆｒｅｅ Ｓｔｒｅａｍ Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
Today™️)HERE’S!! (WAY) TO WATCH Europa League Game LIVE Streams ON TV CHANNEL
Today™️)HERE’S!! (WAY) TO WATCH Europa League Game LIVE Streams ON TV CHANNEL Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
CBS™️)How to watch Europa League Game on Tonight for free
CBS™️)How to watch Europa League Game on Tonight for free Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
Hyxenflay7737_45653 days ago
Vibe Check
I had a bot taken down that just had the same name as a Disney character
I had a bot taken down that just had the same name as a Disney character I had a Jungle Book bot up that was from a movie adaption not made by Disney—characters had the same names. It’s a 2018 film on Netflix and had nothing to do with any of the Disney versions. And it got taken down. Really annoyed, honestly. I get the DMCA thing, but it literally wasn’t even a Disney thing.
7
5
esnupiland3 days ago
Vibe Check
Which should I watch first?
Which should I watch first? Hi everyone, here’s a list of my recommended anime’s from reddit, friends, etc. Which should I watch first? Currently watching: Fruits Basket and Frieren. I like all genres! Anime’s I’ve seen: - [ ] attack on titan (11/10) - [ ] demon slayer (10/10) - [ ] yona of the dawn (11/10) - [ ] my happy marriage (9/10) - [ ] the fragrant flower blooms with dignity (8/10) - [ ] ouran high school host club (9/10) - [ ] jujitsu kaisen (started) - [ ] apothecary diaries (9/10) - [ ] black butler (7/10, never finished) - [ ] a sign of affection (8/10) - [ ] avatar the last airbender (11/10 Animes I have yet to watch: - [ ] fruits basket (crunchy roll) - [ ] maid sama (disney+) - [ ] violet evergarden (netflix) - [ ] frieren (netflix) - [ ] more than a married couple but not lovers (crunchy roll) - [ ] kamisama kiss (crunchy roll or disney+) - [ ] a girl and her guard dog (crunchy roll) - [ ] i want to eat your pancreas - [ ] 7th time loop (crunchy roll) - [ ] romantic killer (netflix) - [ ] snow white with the red hair (crunchy roll) - [ ] erased (crunchy roll) - [ ] death note (netflix) - [ ] vinland saga (netflix) - [ ] ice guy and his cool female colleague (crunchy roll) - [ ] honey lemon soda (crunchy roll) - [ ] the gorilla god’s go-to girl (crunchy roll) - [ ] attack on titan jr high (crunchy roll) - [ ] full metal brotherhood (crunchy roll) - [ ] kill la kill - [ ] spy x family (crunchy roll) - [ ] jjk (netflix) - [ ] banana fish (crunchy roll ?) - [ ] 86 (crunchy roll) - [ ] buddy daddies - [ ] rokka no yuusha - [ ] the rising of the shield hero
3
15
Minimum-Guard-57102 days ago
Vibe Check
32 [F4M] British girl looking for something extraordinary 💫
32 [F4M] British girl looking for something extraordinary 💫 🩷 Me: 32, British, brunette, green eyes, plus size, 5ft 7. Friendly, creative, smiley, active, generous, spontaneous, affectionate. Leo. ENFJ. Single mum. Beyoncé fan. Really cool. 🩵 You: Older than me. Attentive, open, fun and energetic. Willing to share photos and selfies right away. (Sorry that you apparently got blackmailed back in 2016 but I can’t bond with a picture of your car/chin/cat) Bonus points for dog dads, real dads, well groomed beards, similar time zones and great accents! 💛 Us: Online but open to IRL if it works! Let’s swap pictures, selfies, videos regularly, and I won’t try to sell you anything! I’ll show you pictures of my pet dog, the dress I’m wearing that day, the wild deer and foxes outside my house, and the food I cook! I’ll video all you at 2am when you’re sad, recommend music I think you’d like, and share my incredible chocolate chip cookie recipe with you. Let’s watch Netflix shows together. Let me doodle inappropriate sketches while I’m in meetings and send them to you. I’ll send you voice messages to wake up to, share pictures of things that make me think of you, and tell you how hot you look when you just wake up all scruffy and sleepy. I’ll let you rant about your annoying colleague, help you pick out a new tie for that interview, flirt a little to keep us smiling, and be the best pocket pal you never knew you needed. To be very honest, I want to fall in love and be adorable best friends that maybe flirt together sometimes 😅 maybe we are soulmates and meet and never look back. Maybe we find a steady friend who can have each others back for years to come. I don’t know! Find out with me!
3
1
jlo1173 days ago
Vibe Check
Cassandra Coleman's new song "Bite My Tongue" is featured in Season 2 of Netflix's Nobody Wants This
Cassandra Coleman's new song "Bite My Tongue" is featured in Season 2 of Netflix's Nobody Wants This [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZReOxA5MA6I](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZReOxA5MA6I)
2
0
jamiestar92 days ago
Vibe Check
CNBC Sport: What to expect as a Paramount bid for WBD looms
CNBC Sport: What to expect as a Paramount bid for WBD looms All deals, big or small, need a willing buyer and a willing seller. Paramount is preparing a bid to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, CNBC reported several weeks ago. The question for Warner Bros. Discovery Chief Executive Officer David Zaslav and his board will be whether to accept Paramount’s bid or to wait and move forward with a planned splitting of the company into two – a linear cable networks-driven entity called Discovery Global and a studio and streaming service firm to be called Warner Bros. If Paramount and WBD agree to a transaction, it would create a media and sports behemoth, bringing together TNT Sports and CBS Sports. March Madness would be united under one corporate roof. While a combined company still wouldn’t have NBA rights, after Warner Bros. Discovery failed to secure them in the league’s most recent TV deal beginning this upcoming season, it would have the NFL, MLB, NHL, some college football, UFC, NASCAR and much more. In other words, it would be a sports giant not quite the size of ESPN, but pretty close to NBCUniversal. A tie-up would be enormous in scale and in dollars. Warner Bros. Discovery is currently trading at around $19 a share, giving the company a market capitalization of $47 billion. Add another $30 billion in net debt and an additional takeover premium, and we’re talking about a transaction that could reach $90 billion. My colleague David Faber reported last month a bid could come in between $22 and $24 a share. I’m sure Zaslav will push for even more. Zaslav’s leverage is that he and the board believe there could be a bidding war for the Warner Bros. assets that will lift the value so high as to make Paramount’s bid for the entire company seem undervalued. Zaslav has told others that companies like Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Comcast could be interested in the studios and streaming business, according to people familiar with the matter, and he might be right. HBO and Warner Bros. studio would fit nicely with any of those companies. Paramount probably wants to avoid a bidding war, which could force the world’s second-wealthiest person and would-be-backer Larry Ellison’s hand into making an aggressive bid for the company before it splits into two. Companies such as Netflix, Apple and Amazon aren’t interested in owning legacy media assets like cable networks. Paramount, on the other hand, would have synergies by clumping its cable networks together with Warner’s for added distribution heft with pay TV providers. A combined company could keep the networks for the cash flow and the sports rights, or it could eventually split them off like Warner Bros. Discovery had planned. There’s another reason Paramount may want to move early, I’m told. The Skydance-Paramount merger ended up taking longer than expected after the FCC dragged its feet on approving a deal until after a “60 Minutes” settlement yielded $16 million to President Donald Trump. During that time, I’m told Paramount’s assets have degraded in value. This isn’t a surprise. The company’s linear TV assets have long been in a state of decline. Executives haven’t been able to move forward with strategic business decisions given the state of the company was in limbo. Some of those executives, including former co-CEOs Chris McCarthy and Brian Robbins, aren’t even with the company anymore. We’ll find out the extent of the depreciation of value when Paramount reports its third-quarter earnings in November. But that won’t really matter if Paramount strikes a deal with WBD. The whole narrative of the company’s future will be different. I asked NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell what he thought of Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison’s ambition to grow the company so quickly after closing the merger. “It’s exciting for us because it’s showing one of our big partners who is attempting to transform itself right before our eyes,” said Goodell in an exclusive interview last week. “I think they’re recognizing the value of content.” Goodell has reason to be thrilled. Last year, Paramount, which owns CBS Sports, looked like a weakling compared to its competitors. Just as the NBA pulled out from its media rights deal with WBD given its diminished scale relative to rivals, one could have imagined Goodell making the same choice with Paramount. But if Paramount bulks up with a WBD combo, that company will have a huge balance sheet and a very wealthy part-owner in Larry Ellison. The biggest wild card is Comcast’s NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC (at least, until January, when CNBC will be spun off as part of Versant). A company like Netflix doesn’t want Paramount to buy Warner Bros. Discovery on the cheap. A company like NBCUniversal doesn’t want Paramount to buy WBD at all because it directly affects its very existence. Pushing Paramount and Warner together would make NBCUniversal and Peacock even more subscale than it already is. That could make NBCUniversal a less desirable home, in the future, for major sports and entertainment talent that want to maximize viewership. Would a sports league want to put programming on Peacock, or a combined Paramount+ and HBO Max? The latter would have far more viewers. Would Comcast CEO Brian Roberts and soon-to-be co-CEO Mike Cavanagh make a competing bid for all of WBD? Does that even make sense while NBCUniversal is spinning off almost all of its cable networks? Is there another partner out there that NBCUniversal could acquire or merge with? Zaslav has begged for big media consolidation for years. We may finally be on the verge of seeing some dramatic action.
2
6
CosmicCartomancy3 days ago
Vibe Check
The Netflix Boycott and Shadow Number 3
The Netflix Boycott and Shadow Number 3 This is a very interesting read, w/ regards to the Netflix boycott. I asked how things will move forward as rhe result if this boycott. As you can see the dominant suit is diamonds, and they're all reversed, which shows the financial loss, due to a breakdown in what ppl are willing to invest in. But this isnt just about Netflix losing subscriptions, it’s also about ppl withdrawing trust in what the platform stands for. *This is actually a new technique I'm testing out* All diamonds = 16 Shadow 16 can be about abruptness, unexpected endings, ghosting,.etc. Which makes sense w/ the sudden mass membership cancellations. 4 ♤ mirroring 10 ♡ both upright and flanking the reversed diamonds. The 10 ♡ shows the emotional storm coming from the public. It’s collective energy at full volume, ppl are reacting w/ intensity, disappointment, and a deep sense of betrayal 4 ♤ All suits are present apart from clubs ♧ which shows Netflix is paralyzed, they dont know ehat to do. It's like the company is going to be emotionally overwhelmed, structurally unstable, and karmically paused, without a leg to stand on, so to speak. Card total = 30, read as shadow 30. This shows the core background energy as conflicting narratives, gossip, and false or misleading information that spreads like wild fire, especially on social media platforms. I wonder if Elon Musk will regret what he's done?
2
0
picadejoso2 days ago
Vibe Check
30 Filmes que vi nas férias
30 Filmes que vi nas férias Foram 30 filmes em 30 dias de férias. Não foi intencional, e nem foi um filme por dia. Porém foquei mesmo na sétima arte, por mais que não fui ao cinema um dia sequer. Fica o texto como 30 sugestões bastante diversificadas, pequenos comentários, e uma breve análise no fim, sobre onde/como assistir filmes atualmente. ^(\[sem spoiler\] \[nenhum site pirata\]) **Barfly** (1987) - YouTube Revi depois de 12 anos, porque reli o Hollywood do Bukowski, que narra a escrita do argumento e a filmagem dessa obra. Mesmo quem nunca leu o velho safado, mas gosta de filme de bar, gente bebendo, gente brigando, etc tem que dar uma chance. Divertido demais. **Galadiador 2** (2024) - Netflix Vi por "obrigação", da até aquela tristeza se comparar com o 1, mas é um espetáculo visual e tanto em umas tantas cenas. Não vou nem elogiar a melhor parte, porque falar que ela existe já é um spoiler. É aquele filme nota 6 que você vai ver uma vez na vida, achar ok, e nunca mais ver outra vez. **Nosferatu** (2024) - Amazon Prime Não pude ver no cinema, e como me arrependo! Filme maravilhoso. gostei muito dessa versão. Confesso que tinha outros interesses mais prementes enquanto o filme se dava, mas desde o começo notei um respeito e admiração pela obra original que falta tanto nos reboots de hoje... esse vou rever ao longo da vida, com certeza. **Premonição 6** (2025) - HBO Max Eu sabia que seria o tipo de filme gostosinho de ver uma vez, fácil de aplicar na pessoa que vem assistir contigo e provavelmente viu todos, e ainda não viu esse. E sinceramente vem aquela sensação de "eu não vim até aqui para desistir agora, já vi até o 5, vamos ver o 6". Achei um bom mais do mesmo! Os "acidentes" são muito criativos, vale a pena. **Capitão América Admirável Mundo Novo** (2025) - Disney + Pura "obrigação" de seguir o universo da Marvel. O roteiro é muito meia boca, mas tem umas cenas de ação muito boas, principalmente as aéreas. **Thunderbolts** (2025) (a.k.a. Novos Vingadores) - Disney + Melhor filme da Marvel desde o Doutor Destino 2. Os dois nomes que jogam para baixo, mas esse vale a pena até para quem não segue filme de herói, e quer só ver um filme bom. História despretensiosa, personagens carismáticos. Florence Pugh muito bem. **Joana d'Arc** (1948) - Plex TV Não tem legenda pt br. Victor Flaming dá duas aulas aqui, uma de cinema, e outra de história. Claro que tem as suas liberdades, muitas liberdades, mas você sente que é uma personagem de mundo real, no mundo real. Eu já tinha visto o de 1999, e não acredito que tinha deixado esse passar. **Os jovens anos de uma rainha** (1954) - YouTube Filme maravilhoso, mostra uma Rainha Vitoria muito diferente do que geralmente temos em mente. Uma menina-mulher que poderia fácil ser princesa da Disney. o filme é romântico em todos os sentidos da palavra. Para quem gosta é um prato cheio e que pode repetir o quanto quiser. **Coração de Cavaleiro** (2001) - (alugado no YouTube por R$3,99) Acho que todo mundo concorda que é maravilhoso. e quem não viu, tem de ver. Eu nunca tinha assistido no idioma original, só na TV mesmo. E o filme conseguiu ficar ainda melhor para mim assim. Um elogio ao anacronismo; leve, romantico, tanto pessoalmente, quanto com parceiros. **Jasão e os Argonautas** (1963) - Internet Archive "Tem mais acabou" na Netflix, "indisponível na sua região" na Amazon Prime, mas ai joguei no Google, e tinha de graça no archivepontoorg. Eu o assiti quando era criança e nunca mais tinha revisto. Po, alem de ser um filme muito bom, é uma aula de cinema para além de uma de historia do cinema. Os efeitos práticos sao inacreditáveis. Stop motion e os caralhos que não tenho nem competência para elogiar. fico com vergonha de não saber escrever o nome do responsável por elas, como voce deveria ficar, se mesmo assim não sabe de quem eu estou falando. Além de ser um filme dinâmico e rápido para a época, mesmo os Enzos e Valentinas conseguem ver de boa. **Gigôlo por acidente** (1999) - Mercado Play Outro filme que até então eu não tinha visto no original. Comedia que eu adorava quando era adolescente, e pro meu gosto continua muito boa. Você que é jovem e se acha "raiz" tem de ver. Eu acho que é o mesmo pique do humor ali de As Branquelas e o Virgem de 40 anos. Esse foi aquela escolha de quando só queria relaxar e rir um pouco. Quando pesquisei onde assistir, fiquei surpreso com a única opção de resposta. **Rashomon** (1955) - YouTube Kurosawa ainda se tornando O Kurosawa. Esse foi uma sugestão que recebi. Era o único em uma lista de filmes importantes que eu nunca tinha visto. O que me chamou mais a atenção é a cor. Não sei se é porque associo preto e branco a filme noir, mas esse filme as cores parecem magia. Outra coisa é que pela época do filme, não deixa de ser o Japão olhando para dentro no pós guerra, e pós bomba (que considero 2 eventos nacionais diferentes, visto que no primeiro eles se repensam por ter estado do lado dos vilões, e o segundo foram tão vitimas que ficam até atordoados). Enfim... **Cleópatra** (1963) - acervo pessoal Não achei a versão de 6 horas, sempre a procuro! É a quarta vez que vejo esse filme e ainda não acredito nele. As quatro horas de duração parecem 4 eps de anime que você viu na sequência. Para mim esse rolê do Júlio Cesar e da Cleópatra é a parte mais interessante da politica na história do nosso planeta, então ajuda bastante no meu gosto. Mas é um clássico surreal. Tão grandioso em todos os sentidos! Figurino, cenários, ambição! E a Elizabeth Taylor está deslumbrante de uma forma que a própria Cleópatra se sentiria orgulhosa. **Trilogia O Senhor dos Anéis**, versão estendida - acervo pessoal A sociedade do anel (2001) As duas torres (2002) O retorno do rei (2003) Aqui nós estamos falando da elite kkkkk 100/10 eterno, ainda mais se a gente se policiar para não comparar com os livros. De três em três anos costumo rever as versões estendidas. Se tem alguém que não viu LOTR me faça um favor né... e faça um favor para si mesmo. A única versão estendida que é imprescindível é a 2. A primeira se você não leu o livro é ok ver a normal, e a 3 não perde tanta coisa. **Nosferatu** (1922) - YouTube Clássico, obrigatório, curto, interessante e tem de graça no YouTube. Uma aula de história do cinema, mesmo se não gostar do filme. Acho que assustar, não assusta mais, se ir com esse pique dá errado. Mas tirando isso é uma experiência e tanto! "ah, a gente viu o novo, vamos ver o clássico também. - claro, vamos sim" **Bonequinha de Luxo** (1961) - acervo pessoal Por 3 anos tive esse filme aqui e calhou de um dia tudo ir na direção de assisti-lo. Audrey Hapburn faz você rever todos os seus valores aqui. Ou deveria kkkkkk meu deus, que filme bom e que atuação charmosa, de uma Hollywood tão mais simpática mesmo quando não queria ser. **É o fim** (2013) - Netflix Minha comédia favorita. Devo ter visto dez vezes. É da turma do James Franco e Seth Rogen, e tem muitas participações especiais. Aquela comédia de maconha engraçada pra quem curte. Cheia de referencia ao próprio trabalho dos caras (então quem gosta de Segurando as Pontas da vida vai curtir). Além de ter uma cena com a Emma Watson que eu choro de rir toda vez. Po, tem uma lição de vida honesta e ainda termina com Backstreet Boys. É absolut cinema 10/10 **Todos os Harry Potter** (2001 até 2011) - HBO Max Harry Potter e a pedra filosofal versão estendida Harry Potter e a Câmara secreta versão estendida Harry Potter e o Prisioneiro de Azkaban Harry Potter e o Cálice de fogo Harry Potter e a Ordem da Fênix Harry Potter e o Enigma do Príncipe Harry Potter e as Relíquias das da morte pt1 Harry Potter e as Relíquias da morte pt2 Não vou ficar comentando Harry Potter. Todo mundo sabe do que se trata. O que acho válido é ressaltar as versões estendidas dos dois primeiros filmes, que muita gente nunca viu. Elas são de 2007 e 2009, mas saíram mesmo em DVD's em 2014. No primeiro filme são vários cortezinhos de 45, 30, até 15 segundos. Muitos você nem percebe, mas aumenta mais de 20 minutos de filme. Já no Camara Secreta tem várias cenas que melhoram o filme muito, e desenvolvem melhor o Harry enquanto figura pública. Impressionante como tem fala de figurante kkkk. É quase meia hora a mais de filme, acredito. A sensação é ainda maior. Infelizmente não tem versões estendidas dos outros, e olha que tem material. No YouTube qualquer um encontra quase 3 horas de cenas cortadas desses filmes. Eu acho que principalmente o 3 pede muito uma versão maior... **13º Guerreiro** (1999) - Disney + Eu fico de cara como 1999 foi o melhor ano do cinema. nunca paro de descobrir filmes bons que saíram nele. O Bandeiras convence muito de Ahmed Ibn Fhadlan aqui, e os vikings do filme passam uma vibe mais real. Ainda mantem as características que esperamos em vikings, mas são menos caricatos, e de forma alguma parecem super heróis. É um bom filme, mas não é uma grande produção. Filme para ver de bobeira assim, não fazer dele um evento. Eu particularmente gosto da parada mística-neandertal que o filme traz, mas para algumas pessoas não passa... **Os Cavaleiros do Zodíaco - Prólogo do Céu** (2004) - Facebook Única animação da lista. Eu terminei de reler os 48 mangás clássicos da Conrad, e tal qual fiz 20 anos atrás, fui ver esse filme. Sei que o projeto foi descontinuado, e que Next Dimensions em mangá é a continuação cânone etc. Foi mais uma parada nostalgia que tem muito valor. Além do filme per si ser uma parada bem diferente de um filme de anime padrão. Os cenários bem bonitos, focado num amor do Seya pela Saori mais do que pela Atena per si. Não achei o filme em lugar nenhum de streaming, qual não foi minha surpresa quando o vi no Facebook, e em um post de antes da pandemia! **The Bling Ring - A gangue de Hollywood** (2013) - Amazon Prime adicionando assinatura do DIAMOND FILMS + que custa R$19,99 \[porém há um período de teste gratuito de 7 dias\] Obrigado Sofia Copolla por dar essa versão da Emma Watson para o mundo kkkk Nunca te critiquei! Sem sacanagem, e com sacanagem, é um filme bem gostoso de ver. Apesar do tema ser crime, é de uma pureza que até encanta, se você tiver nostalgia nesse tipo de mundo. Como eu bato idade com a maioria dos atores (tenho 33 anos), é engraçado olhar para o começo da década de 2010 assim... parece que foi ontem e o mundo já mudou foda. Bem, mesmo quem não gostar do filme, não tem como reclamar da vista. Cabe dizer: 1 - Artista que mais apareceu: Emma Watson, em dez filmes. 2 - Vi todos os filmes no idioma original, mas com exceção do Joanna d'Arc, todos os filmes citados tem legenda em ptbr, mas não posso falar quanto a dublagem (mas se tiver, geralmente é boa). 3 - Não vi nenhum filme dos meus diretores favoritos. E pela primeira vez na minha vida, fiquei uma férias inteira sem ver Star Wars. 4- Dos filmes que eu pensei em ver, só desisti de assistir o Homem da Máscara de Ferro, pois o mais barato que achei no dia foi alugar na Amazon Prime por R$19,99, aí meu dinheiro não é capim. (E não me arrependo, pois foi nesse dia que revi Coração de Cavaleiro.) 5 - Onze desses filmes eu vi pela primeira vez. Então 19 foram revendo (rei da Matemática). Hoje em dia eu tenho quase todos os streamings. O HBO Max vem no meu plano de internet, o Disney + no do celular, a Amazon eu assino por causa do frete grátis, do Futebol, e também me impede de ver propaganda na Twitch. A Netflix eu tenho pago, esse mês não compensou, mas mês passado por exemplo eu revi todo o Stranger Things e vi 2 filmes. Enfim... a questão é que se for ver, mesmo assim, grande parte dos filmes que eu vi nesse recorte foram fora desses meios. O YouTube é excelente para filme antigo, quase nenhum da propaganda e estão todos nas melhores qualidades. E para quem sabe ingles o Internet Archive e o Plex tem clássicos e mais clássicos. Até no Facebook e no Mercado Livre tem filme! **Acho que todos os streamings valem a pena, mas não vale a pena pagar por todos.** Melhor ir revezando trimestralmente dentro do que espera ver, se for o caso. Se estiver sem dinheiro, da para se virar bem sem nenhum por anos, até se estabilizar minimamente. Isso se você já tiver esgotado os testes grátis do seu IP. E outra coisa que eu acho que vale muito, mas muito a pena, é ainda ter mídia física. Principalmente filme que você for ver a vida toda. Do Play Station 2 eterno para ver gravado, até um blue-ray maneiro, o investimento é certeiro. A parada é sua, você não depende de mais ninguém, nem da internet em si. Uma dica final que eu quero deixar: **Parem de ir para o streaming sem saber o que vão assistir. Decidam primeiro, depois vejam se tem ou não. Se não o título, ao menos o estilo ou o diretor.** Deixar para última hora faz você perder um tempo precioso! As vezes meia hora do seu dia. Se juntar todas as vezes que isso acontece da uns 15 filmes por ano. As vezes é a diferença entre 7 e 6 horas de sono. Se alguém chegou até aqui, e mesmo assim não tirou uma indicação de filme, ou reflexão quanto ao streaming, desculpe sz kkkkkkkkk
2
3
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
HERE’S*! WAY TO WATCH UEFA Europa League Game 𝕃𝕚𝕧𝕖 Ｆｒｅｅ Ｓｔｒｅａｍ
HERE’S*! WAY TO WATCH UEFA Europa League Game 𝕃𝕚𝕧𝕖 Ｆｒｅｅ Ｓｔｒｅａｍ Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
Today™️)HERE’S!! (WAY) TO WATCH Europa League Game LIVE Streams ON TV CHANNEL
Today™️)HERE’S!! (WAY) TO WATCH Europa League Game LIVE Streams ON TV CHANNEL Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
SeaBerry91683 days ago
Vibe Check
CBS™️)How to watch Europa League Game on Tonight for free
CBS™️)How to watch Europa League Game on Tonight for free Do you know what would be the best way to watch the Europa League Live Streams 2025 Europa League Live Streams in my case? Where and how is Way to Watch Europa League Live Streams FRee, Hey fellow Europa League Live Streams 2025 viewers. I am a new Europa League Live Streams fan and with no Europa League Live Streams TV available looking for a good option to watch games here in the land down under. Here's How Can i find Europa League Live Streams free streams options I've been wanting to watch more games lately, but most online links I've found either skip frequently or are lower quality. But lately I have gotten really into Europa League Live Streams and ly i found a great way to watch Europa League Live Streams live for free recommend... Stream all UEFA Europa League matches live and on-demand with Paramount+. Additional coverage and original programming will also be available on CBS Sports ... Watch UEFA Europa League highlights and more great football video on UEFA.tv. Latest Europa League 2025/26 fixtures Here is latest schedule for this week's Europa League matches: All times ET Thursday, October 2 Bologna vs. Freiburg (12:45 p.m.) Celtic vs. SC Braga (12:45 p.m.) FCSB vs. Young Boys (12:45 p.m.) Fenerbahce vs. Nice (12:45 p.m.) Ludogorets vs. Real Betis (12:45 p.m.) Panathinaikos vs. GA Eagles (12:45 p.m.) Roma vs. Lille (12:45 p.m.) Brann vs. Utrecht (12:45 p.m.) Viktoria Plzen vs. Malmo (12:45 p.m.) Basel vs. Stuttgart (3 p.m.) Celta vs. PAOK (3 p.m.) Porto vs. Crvena Zvezda (3 p.m.) Feyenoord vs. Aston Villa (3 p.m.) Genk vs. Ferencvaros (3 p.m.) M. Tel-Aviv vs. Dinamo (3 p.m.) Nottingham Forest vs. Midtjylland (3 p.m.) Lyon vs RB Salzburg (3 p.m.) Sturm Graz vs. Rangers (3 p.m.) How to watch the 2025-26 UEFA Europa League season: Find a complete guide to how to watch all UEFA Europa League games on cable TV including ESPN, FOX and NBC, and all streaming services including ESPN+ ... In the United States, CBS Sports have the exclusive English-language rights to broadcast UEFA Europa League games. This also includes UEFA Europa League and . Many UEFA preseason games are broadcast on local channels, so if you're looking to catch an in-market game, it may be as simple as turning on your TV (or setting up a digital TV antenna) or finding a live TV streaming service that carries the correct RSN (Regional Sports Network). If you want to watch out-of-market games, a $7 monthly subscription to UEFA+ will let you watch every out-of-market local and primetime game in the season on your phone — but only a select few regular-season games on your TV. You could also spring for the uber-expensive UEFA Monday Ticket package to get every out-of-market Monday game of the season. When it comes to nationally broadcast games, UEFA games typically air across ESPN, NBC, CBS, Fox, ABC and UEFA Network. Saturday Night Football games stream exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, select football games will stream exclusively on Peacock, games on CBS will stream live on Paramount+, and Europa League games will air on ESPN or ABC and stream on the newly revamped ESPN+ this season. That's six channels and four streaming platforms to keep up with this season — and that's not counting your local RSN's for in-market games and an UEFA+ or UEFA Monday Ticket subscription for out-of-market games. Plus, Netflix is once again hosting at least two Christmas Day matches, so add that subscription into the mix. And we can't forget about Fox One, Fox's first streaming service, a place where you can also stream games airing on FOX (if you don't already have access to it).
1
1
🎯
Want More Than a Snapshot?
This VibeCheck is powered by Pluggo — your AI-powered social listening platform. We find high-intent leads from Reddit, Twitter, Hacker News, and more, so you can engage prospects when it matters most.
📊
Curious About Another Brand?
Check the vibe of any brand and see how people really feel about them online.
Check Another BrandShare This Report
Let others see how Netflix is perceived online
Or share on
FrequentlyAsked Questions
Everything you need to know about finding your next customer on social media.
Still have questions? We'd love to help! Reach out at hello@pluggo.ai
Still have questions? We'd love to help!
Reach out at hello@pluggo.ai
Want more than a snapshot?
Monitor Netflix ongoing
Get real-time alerts when sentiment shifts, competitors are mentioned, or new opportunities arise. Track your brand's vibe over time with Pluggo's continuous social listening.
Free 7-day trial • No credit card required